Quote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 10:04:11 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 10:01:48 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 09:07:42 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same. But why is some cheating Ok, e.g. fouling or claiming a corner when you know it isn't, yet diving or simulation is always singled out to be somehow morally reprehensible?I wouldn't say that it was ok. We don't get threads like this about any other type of 'cheating'.If we had a player who fouled people considerably more often than was the norm, I bet we would have threads about it on here.I bet Sunderland forums have threads about Cattermole and how he shouldn't foul people as much.It's more than that though, you're adding a moral perspective. Is Cattermole kicking people morally wrong? if so every player in the world is at times guilty of it. In this country we have decided that diving is somehow 'bad cheating' yet kicking lumps out of each other is 'good cheating'. Paul Scholes is one of the dirtiest players in the league yet I don't think any of us would have said no had we signed him at his peak.
Quote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 10:01:48 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 09:07:42 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same. But why is some cheating Ok, e.g. fouling or claiming a corner when you know it isn't, yet diving or simulation is always singled out to be somehow morally reprehensible?I wouldn't say that it was ok. We don't get threads like this about any other type of 'cheating'.If we had a player who fouled people considerably more often than was the norm, I bet we would have threads about it on here.I bet Sunderland forums have threads about Cattermole and how he shouldn't foul people as much.
Quote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 09:07:42 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same. But why is some cheating Ok, e.g. fouling or claiming a corner when you know it isn't, yet diving or simulation is always singled out to be somehow morally reprehensible?I wouldn't say that it was ok. We don't get threads like this about any other type of 'cheating'.
Quote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same. But why is some cheating Ok, e.g. fouling or claiming a corner when you know it isn't, yet diving or simulation is always singled out to be somehow morally reprehensible?I wouldn't say that it was ok.
Quote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same. But why is some cheating Ok, e.g. fouling or claiming a corner when you know it isn't, yet diving or simulation is always singled out to be somehow morally reprehensible?
Quote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same.
Quote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.
Quote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?
In the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"
Quote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 10:01:48 PMWe don't get threads like this about any other type of 'cheating'.We would get threads just as big if one of our players was a thug or a constant niggly fouling twat, but none of them are particularly. Ashley however is a diver, and as a Villa player who dives he will get discussed on here.Do you condone all cheating or only that perpetuated by Villa players?
We don't get threads like this about any other type of 'cheating'.
I'm not condoning them either, just accepting that footballers will always do whatever it takes (that they can get away with) to gain an advantage.
Me and you have made the best posts in this thread.
TECHNICIALLY it is cheating when defenders are constantly hacking Ash (it's funny how some people in this thread don't notice and realise that Ash takes a lot of shit off defenders, they only highlight his 'diving' yawnz), because in the laws of the game hacking and trying to paralyse a player's lower-body is not permitted. It goes both ways ya know.
tackling is part and parcel of the game, any book on the techniques of football will have a chapter on tackling, and how to make good tackles. any one 'kicking lumps' will be cautioned and sent of if neccesary.you wont find the chapter on Diving, because its not part of the game, Athletes wont find the chapter on the best drugs to use because its not part of athletics, but we all know it goes on, Cricketers wont find the chapter on spot betting, because its not supposed to be part of the game, but it still happens, what do we do just say, well we know it all happens lets just accept it as part of the gameto say you wont stop blatent diving and cheating in football, and go along with the 'everyone does it, so its ok if we do' is to condone it
Quote from: The Situation on October 14, 2010, 12:10:49 AMMe and you have made the best posts in this thread.That's rather presumptious of you, personally I don't think much of your posts at all, especially as you have used the word "yawnz", At least you haven't used "lolwut" in this thread yet.QuoteTECHNICIALLY it is cheating when defenders are constantly hacking Ash (it's funny how some people in this thread don't notice and realise that Ash takes a lot of shit off defenders, they only highlight his 'diving' yawnz), because in the laws of the game hacking and trying to paralyse a player's lower-body is not permitted. It goes both ways ya know.Fouls are punished by free-kicks, penalties and sometimes bookings, if Ash stopped hurling himself into the air before he is even touched then he wouldn't have a reputation for diving.
We ought to start a new thread examining why Carew's performances this season have been so lacklustre and devoid of energyCarew - Muff diver?