Quote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.
Quote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?
In the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"
Quote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same.
Quote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same. But why is some cheating Ok, e.g. fouling or claiming a corner when you know it isn't, yet diving or simulation is always singled out to be somehow morally reprehensible?
Quote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same. But why is some cheating Ok, e.g. fouling or claiming a corner when you know it isn't, yet diving or simulation is always singled out to be somehow morally reprehensible?I wouldn't say that it was ok.
Quote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 09:07:42 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same. But why is some cheating Ok, e.g. fouling or claiming a corner when you know it isn't, yet diving or simulation is always singled out to be somehow morally reprehensible?I wouldn't say that it was ok. We don't get threads like this about any other type of 'cheating'.
Quote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 10:01:48 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 09:07:42 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: Dave on October 13, 2010, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 13, 2010, 05:20:34 PMQuote from: john e on October 13, 2010, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: The Situation on October 13, 2010, 04:57:12 PMIn the great words of Jim Rome "If youre not cheating, youre not trying and its only cheating if you get caught"what about bribing the ref before the game to let you have a penalty, would that be OK in your cheating is ok as long as you dont get caught world ?But this is winning a penalty but exaggeration, not bribery. He was fouled twice, if referees were more willing to give penalties for fouls without people throwing themself to the floor then less people would dive.It was blatant cheating and horrible when Pennant dived in the 90th minute which meant we lost to Stoke.It's no less morally wrong when Young does the same. But why is some cheating Ok, e.g. fouling or claiming a corner when you know it isn't, yet diving or simulation is always singled out to be somehow morally reprehensible?I wouldn't say that it was ok. We don't get threads like this about any other type of 'cheating'.If we had a player who fouled people considerably more often than was the norm, I bet we would have threads about it on here.I bet Sunderland forums have threads about Cattermole and how he shouldn't foul people as much.
It's more than that though, you're adding a moral perspective. Is Cattermole kicking people morally wrong? if so every player in the world is at times guilty of it. In this country we have decided that diving is somehow 'bad cheating' yet kicking lumps out of each other is 'good cheating'. Paul Scholes is one of the dirtiest players in the league yet I don't think any of us would have said no had we signed him at his peak.
Quote from: Chris Smith on October 13, 2010, 10:15:08 PMIt's more than that though, you're adding a moral perspective. Is Cattermole kicking people morally wrong? if so every player in the world is at times guilty of it. In this country we have decided that diving is somehow 'bad cheating' yet kicking lumps out of each other is 'good cheating'. Paul Scholes is one of the dirtiest players in the league yet I don't think any of us would have said no had we signed him at his peak.No, but if he then spent games deliberately fouling people I would want him to stop doing so regardless of how good a player he was. And I don't really think that anyone thinks that kicking lumps out of people is good. I don't think anyone is saying that we shouldn't have bought Young or that they don't want him to play for us. They want him to carry on playing well but without the unnecessary diving.I'm realistic enough to know that neither deliberate fouling nor deliberate diving is going to stop anytime soon, from our players or opposition players. But that doesn't mean I have to condone them either.
We don't get threads like this about any other type of 'cheating'.
Defenders cheat blatantly and openly whilst hacking him down. So for every 10 times that he is stopped unfairly (by cheats) he tries to get one over them by simulation.Nothing wrong with that. Carry on Ash.