Malcom keep taking the tablets
I don't think we should be judging who to appoint on the basis of two matches, to be fair. We've done well in them, but we should be looking mainly at what KM did before last week.
Even if we win the next four games, which isn't that unlikely, I think we'd be crazy to appoint KM solely on a good start. Reserve and fringe (frozen) players were always going to be out to prove a point following the managers departure.I don't have any reason not to give him the job; I just hope that if he is given the job its based on a lot more than convenience and results in the first month of the season.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on August 20, 2010, 01:06:10 PMI don't think we should be judging who to appoint on the basis of two matches, to be fair. We've done well in them, but we should be looking mainly at what KM did before last week.Well, the way I see it is he should be judged on the same criteria as any other candidate - who'd do the best job. His advantage is that by being caretaker manager he builds up a more convincing case with each good result we get.
Quote from: John M on August 20, 2010, 01:09:25 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on August 20, 2010, 01:06:10 PMI don't think we should be judging who to appoint on the basis of two matches, to be fair. We've done well in them, but we should be looking mainly at what KM did before last week.Well, the way I see it is he should be judged on the same criteria as any other candidate - who'd do the best job. His advantage is that by being caretaker manager he builds up a more convincing case with each good result we get. Similarly, however, one bad result and it looks a lot less convincing.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on August 20, 2010, 01:23:15 PMQuote from: John M on August 20, 2010, 01:09:25 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on August 20, 2010, 01:06:10 PMI don't think we should be judging who to appoint on the basis of two matches, to be fair. We've done well in them, but we should be looking mainly at what KM did before last week.Well, the way I see it is he should be judged on the same criteria as any other candidate - who'd do the best job. His advantage is that by being caretaker manager he builds up a more convincing case with each good result we get. Similarly, however, one bad result and it looks a lot less convincing.Very true, which is why I was wondering how people's opinions may change after an 'average' result like last night. Does he HAVE to keep winning to be in the frame and one bad one and he's not eve on the radar, as he wasn't when MON first quit?
I find KM difficult to read. Being in front of the TV cameras is such a big part of the job, he would have to find a way to do it.