collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Aston Villa v Newcastle Post-Match Thread by eamonn
[August 18, 2025, 11:53:47 PM]


Unai Emery by Pat McMahon
[August 18, 2025, 11:38:43 PM]


Leander Dendoncker by PeterWithesShin
[August 18, 2025, 11:32:23 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Flamingo Lane
[August 18, 2025, 11:28:34 PM]


The Barton's Arms by frank
[August 18, 2025, 11:13:12 PM]


FFP by Skipper_The_Eyechild
[August 18, 2025, 11:02:17 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by mrfuse
[August 18, 2025, 10:51:07 PM]


Standard of Refereeing by Brend'Watkins
[August 18, 2025, 10:44:01 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Aston Villa v Newcastle Post-Match Thread by eamonn
[August 18, 2025, 11:53:47 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by Pat McMahon
[August 18, 2025, 11:38:43 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by PeterWithesShin
[August 18, 2025, 11:32:23 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by Smithy
[August 18, 2025, 11:31:40 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by cdbearsfan
[August 18, 2025, 11:31:01 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by cdbearsfan
[August 18, 2025, 11:29:14 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Flamingo Lane
[August 18, 2025, 11:28:34 PM]


Re: The Barton's Arms by frank
[August 18, 2025, 11:13:12 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Martin O'Neill thread (with added sacking #2188)  (Read 350534 times)

Offline QBVILLA

  • Member
  • Posts: 1205
  • Age: 47
  • Location: Quarry Bank
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1875 on: March 19, 2013, 09:56:16 AM »
It was that blatant even Fergie said after the game it was a red card. Phil fecking Dowd.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74600
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1876 on: March 19, 2013, 10:26:02 AM »
The atmosphere was incredible.

The Tarquins however, sat there in plastic silence with a sense of entitlement. c***s.


My Dad, who is a nose, texted me during the match, he was watching it at home, and said the noise generated by the Villa fans was remarkable, and you barely heard a peep from the tarquins.

Offline Meanwood Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8642
  • GM : PCM
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1877 on: March 19, 2013, 10:26:40 AM »

If you take the domestic cups under MON I think the best side we beat were probably Sunderland in the LC 2010 when we won on penalties up there. Which says it all really. Anyone decent and we lost.

That's an interesting point. I'm mentally going through cup runs under MON and I think you're right. Arguably Blackburn were on a level with Sunderland in 2010 but nothing to compare with beating Citeh this year even. Of course in the interests of balance we also never lost to a 4th Division team over 2 legs...

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74600
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1878 on: March 19, 2013, 10:29:37 AM »

If you take the domestic cups under MON I think the best side we beat were probably Sunderland in the LC 2010 when we won on penalties up there. Which says it all really. Anyone decent and we lost.

That's an interesting point. I'm mentally going through cup runs under MON and I think you're right. Arguably Blackburn were on a level with Sunderland in 2010 but nothing to compare with beating Citeh this year even. Of course in the interests of balance we also never lost to a 4th Division team over 2 legs...

That's the crazy thing about this season, and is also something that makes me even more convinced that confidence is a big part of things at Villa this year.

We went to Manchester City and won, putting four past them, and then went to Carrow Road and did the same thing. One of those is a place pretty much nobody has won at for the last two years, and the other is far from an easy place to go and win.

Then we make it easy for a fourth division side to get past us.

The second half of the second leg of the semi, Lambert got it spectacularly wrong with his tactics, but really, the other game and a half was about our fragile confidence.

Offline frank

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2829
  • Location: Horsham, West Sussex
  • GM : 29.01.2026
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1879 on: March 19, 2013, 10:48:38 AM »
Sunderland was a memorable night but I think Blackburn in the semi was a better performance. Against Sunderland, Guzan won it for us with a penalty save in normal time, a decisive save later and then the 3 saved penalties in the shoot-out. It's not as though we dominated the game.
I think the best victory under MON in a cup was Ajax, but all the other European games were pretty dire.

Online eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33806
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1880 on: March 19, 2013, 11:40:17 AM »
I remember very little about that Chelsea game...almost as much of a non-event as the Cup Final against them a decade before. The whole "if Gabby had been given a penalty" in that game and "if Vidic had been sent off" in the League Cup final a few weeks earlier always seemed a bit straw-clutching to me and that we were still thinking like a small team hoping to get a break against the giants rather than seeing them as competitors/near equals which I thought the whole point of that stage in our ascent under O'Neill was.

O'Neill's whole ethos and character is suited to that of a plucky manager at a club in thrall to the big boys.

I'd buy that more if the Vidic tackle hadn't deserved a straight red.  99% of the time a tackle like that, in that situation, is a red card.  That he wasn't even booked which meant he could carry on kicking lumps out of us until he finally did get booked in the 2nd half.  That's why a lot of fans still cling to that one, the whole game could've changed if the ref hadn't bottled out of a fairly simple decision: Was it a foul? Was he the last man? Was Gabby through with a clear goalscoring chance if he wasn't fouled?  Yes to all 3 is a red card.

There is nothing of thinking like a small team about that, no one can know what would've happened afterwards and we might still have lost but being pissed off at a terrible decision isn't limited to small teams, Fergie bitches about the ref every time they lose (although probably mostly in a "I'm dropping him next week after that" way).

That's fair enough, it's just the assertion that we had to get a break like that for us to even have a chance of winning. We'd played them in the league at VP a few weeks earlier and Nani was sent-off early on yet they had the better chances after that and the game finished level. We got a penalty out of the Vidic challenge and we didn't look like scoring for the rest of the game so I don't feel as strongly as most do, legitimately as you described, with regards to the non-sending off.

Offline badminton

  • Member
  • Posts: 61
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1881 on: March 19, 2013, 11:43:12 AM »

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 42944
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1882 on: March 19, 2013, 11:52:58 AM »
Sunderland was a memorable night but I think Blackburn in the semi was a better performance. Against Sunderland, Guzan won it for us with a penalty save in normal time, a decisive save later and then the 3 saved penalties in the shoot-out. It's not as though we dominated the game.
I think the best victory under MON in a cup was Ajax, but all the other European games were pretty dire.

Prague was a good trip.

The first game we have won away in the Waffa Cup proper since we beat Celta Vigo.

Offline frank

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2829
  • Location: Horsham, West Sussex
  • GM : 29.01.2026
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1883 on: March 19, 2013, 12:03:01 PM »
Article published today on the woes on Wearside

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blo
Quote
Sunderland fans are concerned about his reluctance to rotate players ("We don't rotate like Manchester United but we need to give players a bit of a rest occasionally," O'Neill says), switch formations from his default 4-4-1-1 or drop under-achievers such as their former England winger, Johnson, who has started every league game when fit. There is a sense that the team lacks a coherent vision or philosophy.
Sounds familiar!

Offline Tony Boucher

  • Member
  • Posts: 671
  • Location: Derbyshire
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1884 on: March 19, 2013, 12:33:15 PM »
I remember very little about that Chelsea game...almost as much of a non-event as the Cup Final against them a decade before. The whole "if Gabby had been given a penalty" in that game and "if Vidic had been sent off" in the League Cup final a few weeks earlier always seemed a bit straw-clutching to me and that we were still thinking like a small team hoping to get a break against the giants rather than seeing them as competitors/near equals which I thought the whole point of that stage in our ascent under O'Neill was.

O'Neill's whole ethos and character is suited to that of a plucky manager at a club in thrall to the big boys.

I'd buy that more if the Vidic tackle hadn't deserved a straight red.  99% of the time a tackle like that, in that situation, is a red card.  That he wasn't even booked which meant he could carry on kicking lumps out of us until he finally did get booked in the 2nd half.  That's why a lot of fans still cling to that one, the whole game could've changed if the ref hadn't bottled out of a fairly simple decision: Was it a foul? Was he the last man? Was Gabby through with a clear goalscoring chance if he wasn't fouled?  Yes to all 3 is a red card.

There is nothing of thinking like a small team about that, no one can know what would've happened afterwards and we might still have lost but being pissed off at a terrible decision isn't limited to small teams, Fergie bitches about the ref every time they lose (although probably mostly in a "I'm dropping him next week after that" way).

That's fair enough, it's just the assertion that we had to get a break like that for us to even have a chance of winning. We'd played them in the league at VP a few weeks earlier and Nani was sent-off early on yet they had the better chances after that and the game finished level. We got a penalty out of the Vidic challenge and we didn't look like scoring for the rest of the game so I don't feel as strongly as most do, legitimately as you described, with regards to the non-sending off.

Totally agree eamonn - we barely hung on in that league game, when they had 10 men for the last hour!  They still had 56% possession, 12 shots to our 10 & 7 corners to our 1, I seem to recall Rooney being all over us & hitting woodwork.  I am far from convinced we'd have won the final if Vidic had been sent off - although that didn't stop me being furious at the time & bitter to this day.

Online eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33806
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1885 on: March 19, 2013, 12:34:11 PM »
Quote
It has been said before but MON has significant flaws, including an inflexible approach, failure to rotate squads despite obvious form issues, inability to see beyond set team structures and a dour approach to the game. He is very set in his ways and won't accept any criticism (ask any Villa fans).

A "magnificently appointed, 49,000-capacity home"? Sorry Louise, your blinkered love might be in Wearside but the cheap meccano Stadium is looking more and more like a palace of faded pink empty seats each week.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74600
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1886 on: March 19, 2013, 12:39:34 PM »
I know we occasionally give away tickets, but Sunderland have been giving away thousands every home game for years, by all accounts.

I was nosing around their forum the other day and a student at the uni there was saying how they always have them kicking around in reception, to help yourself to, and you can literally walk away with handfuls of them.

Added to that, another thing Sunderland do is stick lots of tickets on stubhub (or viagogo, whichever they use) at mentally low prices - 10 or 12 quid a pop - to shift them.

Their ST holders are by all accounts mightily unimpressed that this still happens.

Offline Chico Hamilton III

  • Member
  • Posts: 19657
  • Location: South London
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1887 on: March 19, 2013, 12:43:56 PM »
I know we occasionally give away tickets, but Sunderland have been giving away thousands every home game for years, by all accounts.

I was nosing around their forum the other day and a student at the uni there was saying how they always have them kicking around in reception, to help yourself to, and you can literally walk away with handfuls of them.

Added to that, another thing Sunderland do is stick lots of tickets on stubhub (or viagogo, whichever they use) at mentally low prices - 10 or 12 quid a pop - to shift them.

Their ST holders are by all accounts mightily unimpressed that this still happens.

Other than the way season ticket holders are being treated, isn't this a good thing?

Online john2710

  • Member
  • Posts: 3091
  • Location: Hall Green
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1888 on: March 19, 2013, 12:48:49 PM »
I remember very little about that Chelsea game...almost as much of a non-event as the Cup Final against them a decade before. The whole "if Gabby had been given a penalty" in that game and "if Vidic had been sent off" in the League Cup final a few weeks earlier always seemed a bit straw-clutching to me and that we were still thinking like a small team hoping to get a break against the giants rather than seeing them as competitors/near equals which I thought the whole point of that stage in our ascent under O'Neill was.

O'Neill's whole ethos and character is suited to that of a plucky manager at a club in thrall to the big boys.

I'd buy that more if the Vidic tackle hadn't deserved a straight red.  99% of the time a tackle like that, in that situation, is a red card.  That he wasn't even booked which meant he could carry on kicking lumps out of us until he finally did get booked in the 2nd half.  That's why a lot of fans still cling to that one, the whole game could've changed if the ref hadn't bottled out of a fairly simple decision: Was it a foul? Was he the last man? Was Gabby through with a clear goalscoring chance if he wasn't fouled?  Yes to all 3 is a red card.

There is nothing of thinking like a small team about that, no one can know what would've happened afterwards and we might still have lost but being pissed off at a terrible decision isn't limited to small teams, Fergie bitches about the ref every time they lose (although probably mostly in a "I'm dropping him next week after that" way).

That's fair enough, it's just the assertion that we had to get a break like that for us to even have a chance of winning. We'd played them in the league at VP a few weeks earlier and Nani was sent-off early on yet they had the better chances after that and the game finished level. We got a penalty out of the Vidic challenge and we didn't look like scoring for the rest of the game so I don't feel as strongly as most do, legitimately as you described, with regards to the non-sending off.

Totally agree eamonn - we barely hung on in that league game, when they had 10 men for the last hour!  They still had 56% possession, 12 shots to our 10 & 7 corners to our 1, I seem to recall Rooney being all over us & hitting woodwork.  I am far from convinced we'd have won the final if Vidic had been sent off - although that didn't stop me being furious at the time & bitter to this day.

In the game at VP, at that point Rooney was on fire, was practically unplayable & it took the entire back 4 to contain him.

In truth, we never really looked like troubling either Man U or Chlsea in the Wembley games.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2013, 12:50:21 PM by john2710 »

Online Pat McMahon

  • Member
  • Posts: 7248
  • Location: Shanghai - Blarney Stone for Villa games
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1889 on: March 19, 2013, 12:52:45 PM »
If we'd scored first, or even equalised, the Villa support would have dragged them over the line. The atmosphere was incredible.

That is what my next door neighbour said to me ( he is a Chelsea fan). That added to their sense of worry until the first goal as they were waiting for Chelsea to get the fans going whereas we were willing Villa on raucously.

Re other comments, anybody who thinks all Chelsea fans are "Tarquins" hasn't come across them very much. They still have a big following of their old growlers who are very happy to indulge in shenanigans, as well as a sizeable number of "scarfers" who will chip in if the occasion arises.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal