collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread  (Read 9722 times)

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 8546
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #255 on: Today at 01:31:34 PM »
Signing jackson would mean ollie or tammy going.



I also, am somewhat excited by the potential signing of The Nacho.

Online Dogtanian

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10751
  • Location: The Streets of Rage ( Tamworth )
  • GM : 07.06.2027
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #256 on: Today at 01:36:13 PM »
I'm going to forever visualise you as Mr Bean, now...  ;D

Online brontebilly

  • Member
  • Posts: 13535
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #257 on: Today at 01:40:38 PM »
Who has Emery saved from the football wilderness?, serious question I’m trying to recall a lost cause being turned around.

Rashford?

Tielemans star was on the slide big time when we signed him

Offline pelty

  • Member
  • Posts: 1380
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #258 on: Today at 01:46:48 PM »
Tha Athletic article seems to hint that this is *the* winger deal this summer as opposed to *one of* them. If that is the case, I hate this. If it was Garnacho on loan and Mbaye as a purchase, then I could live with it, but this seems crazy. There is no evidence to suggest that he is consistently productive; quite the opposite, in fact.

Online frank black

  • Member
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #259 on: Today at 01:47:55 PM »
Who has Emery saved from the football wilderness?, serious question I’m trying to recall a lost cause being turned around.

Rashford?

Tielemans star was on the slide big time when we signed him

Not really, he’d refused to sign a contract and was considered as lazy by a few downtrodden Lesta supporters, who the season before worshipped him. His signature was excellent and welcomed by the majority

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 80896
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #260 on: Today at 01:49:00 PM »
There are no "consistently productive" wingers. Or, if there are, they cost a minimum £100 million which we obviously can't spend.

Online frank black

  • Member
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #261 on: Today at 01:49:04 PM »
Signing jackson would mean ollie or tammy going.

Knowing us, probably Ollie.

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 31842
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #262 on: Today at 01:50:30 PM »
Garny and Guessand down the wings.  What is not to like.

Online frank black

  • Member
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #263 on: Today at 01:52:42 PM »
Garnacho and Maatsen down the left certainly gives us some much needed pace, probably the fastest left side in the League. Not so sure of the defensive side of it though.

What a sobering thought

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 43535
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #264 on: Today at 01:56:22 PM »
Having slept on it, I'm really struggling on us spending €50m on a player that will need major rehabilitation especially when there's very little evidence he'll ever be worth it. The same goes for Nicolas Jackson. I appreciate Unai loves a project but he'll already have his hands full trying to integrate all the new signings.

For €50m there's got to be better alternatives out there?

I think the point is that he is potentially a €100m player available for a lot less than that. We can't spend that sort of money, so we look at the seconds and the refurb jobs, hoping that if we are clever we can get that player at a price that's doable.

It's a risk, but it's our most realistic shot at getting players above our current level.

And there lies my problem, I don't believe he is or ever will be above our current level.

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61918
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2027
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #265 on: Today at 02:16:13 PM »
Guessand must be offered. When the nippers are getting minutes and he isnt, fairly clear what is happening. If we can ship him, we'll get another winger.

If that's specific to last night I assume he's not even back training yet given he was at the world cup. We do need to do something with him though, either sell up or see if he can work as a 9/10 because he didn't look comfortable on the wing and was better at Palace playing much more central.

And while the idea that he might come back, be rehabilitated and be useful might seem ridiculous on what he showed last year, 12 months ago I don't think many of us would have predicted the Buenaissance that was to come either.

He looked decent at Palace in a more central position. I still want him to move on so it frees up space and salary, but  it would be a good start to not employ him as a winger as we were doing.

Online villadelph

  • Member
  • Posts: 6483
  • | UTV | 215 |
  • GM : 20.05.2025
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #266 on: Today at 02:21:14 PM »
For all the negativity around his reputation, I'm still yet to hear one of these horror stories to justify it. Is this a Drinkwater, McCormack, Ireland-esque effort issue or is there actual substance to the dressing room disruption stories?

Manchester United let him down and he was frustrated about it..? Big whoop.

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61918
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2027
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #267 on: Today at 02:24:48 PM »
I don’t see the playing side being an issue. Granted most of us haven’t watched him in detail, and we don’t see him train, but any time I’ve seen him play he hasn’t given the impression he doesn’t give a shit. What a lot of us probably don’t like is some of the social media stuff, which for a kid in his early 20s is probably what they do. He does have a look at me type of persona so that will need to be moulded. It’s going to be up to us to provide that environment and for him to embrace it and rebrand himself as a player and person.

Offline not3bad

  • Member
  • Posts: 12267
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 15.06.2022
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #268 on: Today at 02:30:20 PM »
Who has Emery saved from the football wilderness?, serious question I’m trying to recall a lost cause being turned around.

Rashford?

Have a read how people were talking about McGinn when Emery took over.

Offline Hookeysmith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14056
  • Age: 62
  • Location: One hand on the handle of the mad / sane door
  • GM : 09.02.2027
Re: Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread
« Reply #269 on: Today at 02:36:36 PM »
Here's a little highlights reel. Including footage from last season. This is the sort of play we wanted to see from Bailey, Guessand and Sancho.



There is definitely a hell of a player in there not even sure if he is better on left or right? He is incredibly quick but i used to think (Other than the ridiculous hair and eyebrow combo) that he was always selfish in front of goal and always looking to shoot rather than look for a team mate who was better positioned.

It helps in my mind that he is coming from the Loathsome Chelsea rather than the youknowwho's he started with

In SUE we trust and if he wants him  - make it so

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal