It’s the fact that he has maintained this veneer of innocence regarding the charges.
He knows that they refused to co-operate with the PL and before that UEFA.
So if we are to credit him with the intelligence so endowed by others then it’s pretty obvious that he has chosen to ignore all the evidence to maintain this position of collective innocence.
If he said this is nothing to do with me and I am not going to comment, then fair enough but he has gone a lot further than that and is without doubt part of the subterfuge.
So Mr Walnuts description seems appropriate.