collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Harvey Elliott (signed on loan) by Mister E
[Today at 07:30:40 AM]


Bournemouth v Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by PaulWinch again
[Today at 07:15:23 AM]


Winter 24/26 transfer window - the verdict by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 07:04:21 AM]


Europa League 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:53:04 AM]


Aston Villa v Brentford Post-Match Thread by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:32:16 AM]


Friends runited - 1960-61 pt I by dave.woodhall
[Today at 12:18:10 AM]


Boubacar Kamara by tony scott
[February 03, 2026, 11:52:39 PM]


Tammy Abraham - done by Ozzjim
[February 03, 2026, 11:52:19 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)  (Read 105067 times)

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 35485
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1380 on: February 03, 2026, 07:42:45 PM »
Its funny - Unai seems to have very exact requirements of what he wants - and quite quickly decides against them. 

Im assuming that why Monchi went - maybe he wasnt happy with the targets he got from the shortlists they drew up.

He wanted Asensio back instead I suspect.

And Paqueta, bizarrely.

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11422
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 05.03.2026
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1381 on: February 03, 2026, 07:44:15 PM »
With how much we’ve wasted on guessand and elliot we surely could have afforded Asensio?

The talk on here was that we did want him and had told him that, but that we would have to sell before we could do the deal for him so if he got another offer, as it happened from Fenerbache, to not wait for an offer from us that might not be coming.

Offline brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12267
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1382 on: February 03, 2026, 08:53:31 PM »
Its funny - Unai seems to have very exact requirements of what he wants - and quite quickly decides against them. 

Im assuming that why Monchi went - maybe he wasnt happy with the targets he got from the shortlists they drew up.

He wanted Asensio back instead I suspect.

And Paqueta, bizarrely.

Shoving Rogers out wide to accommodate one of those show ponies. I'm backing Monchi on Elliot being a better bet for the club than those two.

Elliot has been unfortunate as Sancho and Guessand were given every chance and wasted pretty much all of them.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 36897
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1383 on: February 03, 2026, 11:27:58 PM »
With how much we’ve wasted on guessand and elliot we surely could have afforded Asensio?

From what I vaguely remember hearing about Asensio, he wanted to come back, and we wanted him, but we kept him waiting to see if we could afford him. He didn’t want to wait until the last day in case it fell through and he was left in limbo at PSG. So with a few days left he got fed up and signed for Fenerbache.

Point taken on Guessand, but Elliott has only cost us wages. So maybe Asensio’s wages, not the fee, caused an accounting problem against SCR, whereas Guessand’s didn’t.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 36897
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1384 on: February 03, 2026, 11:29:42 PM »
With how much we’ve wasted on guessand and elliot we surely could have afforded Asensio?

The talk on here was that we did want him and had told him that, but that we would have to sell before we could do the deal for him so if he got another offer, as it happened from Fenerbache, to not wait for an offer from us that might not be coming.

Ah, I now see PW beat me to it.

Offline aldridgeboy

  • Member
  • Posts: 3263
  • Location: Aldridge
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1385 on: February 03, 2026, 11:47:14 PM »
Although the muted discussion about renegotiating the 10 game clause led nowhere, does that mean it cant be revisited?

I just wonder come march, and he just isn't getting any game time, and his value plummets, would Liverpool rethink? Would that be allowed ? ( Notwithstanding I get the argument why should they help us as a competitor)

Offline tony scott

  • Member
  • Posts: 826
  • Location: Kiama NSW
  • GM : 31.05.2020
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1386 on: February 03, 2026, 11:56:14 PM »
   If we start to play him on regular basis, do we think he would be motivated to stay if we offered him a deal ?

Offline Skipper_The_Eyechild

  • Member
  • Posts: 783
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1387 on: Today at 01:13:32 AM »
Although the muted discussion about renegotiating the 10 game clause led nowhere, does that mean it cant be revisited?

I just wonder come march, and he just isn't getting any game time, and his value plummets, would Liverpool rethink? Would that be allowed ? ( Notwithstanding I get the argument why should they help us as a competitor)

'For the time being, unless both clubs agree to any future changes to the agreement, Elliott seems to have run out of options.'

That line from the article suggests it is still viable, although I'd still say pretty unlikely.

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10574
  • Location: Kidderminster
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1388 on: Today at 06:30:48 AM »
£35mil is a lot of money - if it was £15mil then it may have been a different sort of season for the lad

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 27662
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1389 on: Today at 06:35:50 AM »
Liverpool and Villa can change the games played trigger of the loan agreement.

Online Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18842
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan)
« Reply #1390 on: Today at 07:30:40 AM »
Shoving Rogers out wide to accommodate one of those show ponies. I'm backing Monchi on Elliot being a better bet for the club than those two.
Elliot has been unfortunate as Sancho and Guessand were given every chance and wasted pretty much all of them.
Correct.




£35mil is a lot of money - if it was £15mil then it may have been a different sort of season for the lad
Your point would be valid if we hadn't spunked £25-30m on The Lump, and paid £220k pw on the largely-ineffectual Sancho.
Last summer, Elliott's stock was high and many people saw him as an emerging international talent. We've somewhat rubbed the gloss off that; to say the least.
« Last Edit: Today at 07:33:47 AM by Mister E »

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal