Donyell Malen (Gone)

[SamTheMouse]

I'm not so sure that Emery sanctioned the Malen sale, he seemed really pissed off after the game, we sold the one backup for Watkins before a replacement came in, Emery is fanatical about detail and that transaction doesn't seem like his decision.

That had crossed my mind, too.

[brontebilly]

I'm not so sure that Emery sanctioned the Malen sale, he seemed really pissed off after the game, we sold the one backup for Watkins before a replacement came in, Emery is fanatical about detail and that transaction doesn't seem like his decision.

Danny Ings was let go when top scorer.

[Drummond]

The deal for Malen may have been off the table if we hadn't done it then.

Why? Are we about to take the deal for Abraham "off the table" because it hasn't happened as quickly as we'd have liked?

They signed him because they wanted him. They don't stop wanting him if we say "but we don't have a forward on our bench for our game this weekend, so we need him for another few days. Or, use whatever influence you have with Besiktas to hurry along our Abraham deal".

Maybe. Maybe we're so financially fucked that we had to move him on when we did. I've no idea, just the same as everyone else. It's a possibility though.

There are plenty of other scenatios that may, or may not, apply.

[aev]

Besiktas playing tonight I think.

Tammy starts....

[ChicagoLion]

The deal for Malen may have been off the table if we hadn't done it then.

Why? Are we about to take the deal for Abraham "off the table" because it hasn't happened as quickly as we'd have liked?

They signed him because they wanted him. They don't stop wanting him if we say "but we don't have a forward on our bench for our game this weekend, so we need him for another few days. Or, use whatever influence you have with Besiktas to hurry along our Abraham deal".

Maybe. Maybe we're so financially fucked that we had to move him on when we did. I've no idea, just the same as everyone else. It's a possibility though.

There are plenty of other scenatios that may, or may not, apply.

Dont see how that is possible based on Financial reporting dates.

[KevinGage]

It looked like we had the green light for the Gallagher deal before news broke that Roma were in advanced talks for Malen. 

Maybe Emery sanctioned it to get a player he’d been keen on for a while - only to see that hit the skids when the divine manbun decided to hide out for a bit in London N17 instead.

We did something similar (though not quite as destructive) last season, when we let Diego Carlos go to free up space for the French lad at Sevilla. Before he decided he didn’t fancy it either.

[aev]

It looked like we had the green light for the Gallagher deal before news broke that Roma were in advanced talks for Malen. 

Maybe Emery sanctioned it to get a player he’d been keen on for a while - only to see that hit the skids when the divine manbun decided to hide out for a bit in London N17 instead.

We did something similar (though not quite as destructive) last season, when we let Diego Carlos go to free up space for the French lad at Sevilla. Before he decided he didn’t fancy it either.

Perhaps the Kamara situation, and now the McGinn situation mean we are having to reallocate what small resources we have?

[john e]

I'm not so sure that Emery sanctioned the Malen sale, he seemed really pissed off after the game, we sold the one backup for Watkins before a replacement came in, Emery is fanatical about detail and that transaction doesn't seem like his decision.

I thought Emery had complete control
if he hasn’t that’s the very bad news for the future

[Ian.]

Even if he does have complete control, as others have said, maybe we've just had to ship one high earner out to give us wiggle room for an incoming.
He was angry, but so are we, so why shouldn't he be as angry as us.

[eye digress]

Even if he does have complete control, as others have said, maybe we've just had to ship one high earner out to give us wiggle room for an incoming.
He was angry, but so are we, so why shouldn't he be as angry as us.

Is that how these sanctions work, on an ongoing, cumulative basis?

Or is it subject to periodic review - i.e., we have to comply at the review date?

Obviously, it might still have been out of our hands to a degree - maybe we'd promised Malen it would go ahead if he played for us at Spurs.

Still, the optics aren't good.

[Percy McCarthy]

Even if he does have complete control, as others have said, maybe we've just had to ship one high earner out to give us wiggle room for an incoming.
He was angry, but so are we, so why shouldn't he be as angry as us.

Is that how these sanctions work, on an ongoing, cumulative basis?

Or is it subject to periodic review - i.e., we have to comply at the review date?

Obviously, it might still have been out of our hands to a degree - maybe we'd promised Malen it would go ahead if he played for us at Spurs.

Still, the optics aren't good.

Tanswell reckons Unai doesn’t like picking players when their head’s out the door because he worries about their focus.

[ChicagoLion]

Even if he does have complete control, as others have said, maybe we've just had to ship one high earner out to give us wiggle room for an incoming.
He was angry, but so are we, so why shouldn't he be as angry as us.

But the accounting date is not 31st January .
We did not have to sell Malen at this time.