Free market forces decide how football has gone in this country. In financial terms the model works and will continue to work offering ever greater returns for those that own the assets.If we want something more like the German model with accessible prices for most it requires intervention. That would probably have to be at government level which is unlikely to happen.It would then still be a very long process. Stadiums being redesigned with substantial areas of safe standing as overseas owners drifted away.
You are right to say, they are the reason we are playing B.Munich and JuventusIf we want to carry on playing them we have to match them financially, I agree that fleecing the fans should not be the first option.Does anyone have a table showing the prices different teams in the competition charge ?
Villa are not Manchester Utd or Liverpool with 10s of thousands of tourists coming every week. We are not Spurs or Arsenal with a potential audience of 10 million people on our doorstep based in one of the most expensive cities in the world. There is an extent in which we have to accept that it is a long process to get to the levels of revenue they achieve. Instead of this we are risking breaking the bonds with our most loyal supporters, so when new fans turn up for their day-trip they are going to find a potentially toxic atmosphere, lots of empty seats and in a ground that is still not fit for purpose. And all of this on the back of the best team we have had in 30 years - it's madness and I cannot believe anyone will be thinking in 12 months time that Chris Heck has done a remotely good job.
It's difficult to understand what thought-process has taken place behind anything that's gone on recently. It seems to me that there is a fundamental failure to understand what Aston Villa is and who our supporters are at the decision making level, and for a number of reasons.Then the pricing - I cannot understand how they are getting this so wrong. Where is Heck getting his data that the current prices are in any way sustainable? I've said this before, but we are relatively fortunate in that we are working in good jobs and are only taking one child to a game, yet we are having to cut back massively on attending this year. In and around Birmingham, if we as a family can no longer afford to go to games I am really struggling to understand where our replacements are coming from. Yes, no doubt we will sell out 50% of matches against bigger opponents, in the CL etc, and will probably make decent money on the GA+ for those games. There are a lot of other matches, however, that I am convinced will have thousands of empty seats, and if regular seats are empty I really can't see who is going to pay GA+ prices of £250 to sit in the lower North with a couple of drinks thrown in.
they've decided to shake us off
Villa are not ... Instead of this we are risking breaking the bonds with our most loyal supporters, so when new fans turn up for their day-trip they are going to find a potentially toxic atmosphere, lots of empty seats and in a ground that is still not fit for purpose. And all of this on the back of the best team we have had in 30 years - it's madness and I cannot believe anyone will be thinking in 12 months time that Chris Heck has done a remotely good job.
Great read, Dave. Up until now I've loved that Villa fans have been 'traditional', it's what makes Villa Park so great. Reading that Celtic fans visiting us will be paying half of what Villa fans will have to pay demonstrates just how wrong the pricing is. Is there time to address and correct the stupidity?