Quote from: Chris_Jephcott on May 13, 2024, 08:37:00 PMQuote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 13, 2024, 08:34:47 PMQuote from: AlexAlexCropley on May 13, 2024, 08:33:19 PMQuote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 13, 2024, 08:31:56 PMIt was onside, why people continue to argue otherwise is beyond me.The law that you can hang around offside for ages and gain an advantage is where the bullshit it is, but it's allowed.Ergo there was an offside passage of playQuite, but it's not the law, so there's nothing to debate.Maybe it was, but I do think that parallax plays a big part in these decisions. Human being only get about 30% of parallax mistakes correct, and the only way to prove it is to look at it in the correct plane of vision. So overhead, looking far it square on…Until there is a camera above then we'll never know, so with the technology we have, it's off. No doubt we would have benefitted from said effect at times.
Quote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 13, 2024, 08:34:47 PMQuote from: AlexAlexCropley on May 13, 2024, 08:33:19 PMQuote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 13, 2024, 08:31:56 PMIt was onside, why people continue to argue otherwise is beyond me.The law that you can hang around offside for ages and gain an advantage is where the bullshit it is, but it's allowed.Ergo there was an offside passage of playQuite, but it's not the law, so there's nothing to debate.Maybe it was, but I do think that parallax plays a big part in these decisions. Human being only get about 30% of parallax mistakes correct, and the only way to prove it is to look at it in the correct plane of vision. So overhead, looking far it square on…
Quote from: AlexAlexCropley on May 13, 2024, 08:33:19 PMQuote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 13, 2024, 08:31:56 PMIt was onside, why people continue to argue otherwise is beyond me.The law that you can hang around offside for ages and gain an advantage is where the bullshit it is, but it's allowed.Ergo there was an offside passage of playQuite, but it's not the law, so there's nothing to debate.
Quote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 13, 2024, 08:31:56 PMIt was onside, why people continue to argue otherwise is beyond me.The law that you can hang around offside for ages and gain an advantage is where the bullshit it is, but it's allowed.Ergo there was an offside passage of play
It was onside, why people continue to argue otherwise is beyond me.The law that you can hang around offside for ages and gain an advantage is where the bullshit it is, but it's allowed.
How did mccalister avoid a booking
Quote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 13, 2024, 08:39:30 PMQuote from: Chris_Jephcott on May 13, 2024, 08:37:00 PMQuote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 13, 2024, 08:34:47 PMQuote from: AlexAlexCropley on May 13, 2024, 08:33:19 PMQuote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 13, 2024, 08:31:56 PMIt was onside, why people continue to argue otherwise is beyond me.The law that you can hang around offside for ages and gain an advantage is where the bullshit it is, but it's allowed.Ergo there was an offside passage of playQuite, but it's not the law, so there's nothing to debate.Maybe it was, but I do think that parallax plays a big part in these decisions. Human being only get about 30% of parallax mistakes correct, and the only way to prove it is to look at it in the correct plane of vision. So overhead, looking far it square on…Until there is a camera above then we'll never know, so with the technology we have, it's off. No doubt we would have benefitted from said effect at times.So you're saying it's off?
Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.
Author
Topic: Aston Villa v Liverpool Match Thread (Read 29631 times)
