Standard of Refereeing

[Demitri_C]

Even though the new angles have shown it wss out by some distance i bet if yhat was manure goal would have been given

[tomd2103]

Just for good measure can I throw this into the mix?

Limits: While there is no specific time limit, the review is limited to the immediate phase of play. If a new phase of play starts (e.g., the defending team clears the ball and establishes control), any previous offence is "written off".

I would suggest that when Kellener parried the ball, Brentford had effectively cleared the ball and therefore a new phase had started and the previous “offence” should have been written off

Although It could probably be argued that although he parried it they did not establish control because it went straight to Tammy

All very subjective - as was the original decision

Can remember the Bailey one that got ruled out a couple of years ago against Sheffield United for a supposed foul on tje keeper from a corner.  The ball broke and Sheffield United had possession on the edge of their box, gave it away, we scored and the goal was ruled out for a questionable foul on the keeper. 

We'd have been top at Christmas if we'd have won that.

[Gareth]

Even though the new angles have shown it wss out by some distance i bet if yhat was manure goal would have been given

. New angles are totally irrelevant, all that matters is what the VAR saw…if they had an angle proving it fine, if they had an angle where they guessed it was out then answers are required

[luke95]

Even though the new angles have shown it wss out by some distance i bet if yhat was manure goal would have been given

100% it would've been given.