collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Standard of Refereeing by luke95
[Today at 11:33:52 PM]


FFP by tomd2103
[Today at 11:32:12 PM]


Winter 25-26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 11:13:00 PM]


Harvey Elliott (signed on loan) by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 11:09:22 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Dante Lavelli
[Today at 10:55:08 PM]


The week in claret and blue by dave.woodhall
[Today at 10:53:10 PM]


Will we qualify for the CL? by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 10:48:31 PM]


2026 Winter Olympics Milano-Cortina by rougegorge
[Today at 10:34:49 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Standard of Refereeing  (Read 74762 times)

Offline Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12839
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #915 on: Today at 09:34:31 PM »
Even though the new angles have shown it wss out by some distance i bet if yhat was manure goal would have been given

Online tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15845
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #916 on: Today at 11:16:07 PM »
Just for good measure can I throw this into the mix?

Limits: While there is no specific time limit, the review is limited to the immediate phase of play. If a new phase of play starts (e.g., the defending team clears the ball and establishes control), any previous offence is "written off".

I would suggest that when Kellener parried the ball, Brentford had effectively cleared the ball and therefore a new phase had started and the previous “offence” should have been written off

Although It could probably be argued that although he parried it they did not establish control because it went straight to Tammy

All very subjective - as was the original decision

Can remember the Bailey one that got ruled out a couple of years ago against Sheffield United for a supposed foul on tje keeper from a corner.  The ball broke and Sheffield United had possession on the edge of their box, gave it away, we scored and the goal was ruled out for a questionable foul on the keeper. 

We'd have been top at Christmas if we'd have won that.

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7455
  • Age: 51
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #917 on: Today at 11:19:56 PM »
Even though the new angles have shown it wss out by some distance i bet if yhat was manure goal would have been given
. New angles are totally irrelevant, all that matters is what the VAR saw…if they had an angle proving it fine, if they had an angle where they guessed it was out then answers are required

Online luke95

  • Member
  • Posts: 1328
  • Location: Here, there, everyfuckingwhere!!
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #918 on: Today at 11:33:52 PM »
Even though the new angles have shown it wss out by some distance i bet if yhat was manure goal would have been given

100% it would've been given.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal