collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 11:29:06 PM]


GUESS THE CROWD R1: ASTON VILLA v Newcastle Utd, Saturday 16th August! by JD
[Today at 11:08:42 PM]


George Hemmings by ozzjim
[Today at 11:06:21 PM]


Evann Guessand (Signed) by Drummond
[Today at 11:04:09 PM]


Emi Buendia by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:48:55 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:31:11 PM]


Where will Villa finish 2025/26 by PaulWinch again
[Today at 10:20:03 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by paul_e
[Today at 10:06:12 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread  (Read 33752 times)

Online Smithy

  • Member
  • Posts: 7195
  • Location: Windsor, Royal Berkshire, la de da
  • GM : 12.12.2024
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #315 on: December 31, 2023, 01:26:38 PM »
On the penalty, it WAS soft, but the context is everything. If they’re going for a 50/50 I don’t think it’s given. I think the fact that he nicked it off the toe of Ramsey Jnr makes the contact more significant.  On the replay the first thing Ramsey Jnr does is look back at the ref because he knows he was robbed and made contact.  The ref only played on to see if we’d score from the advantage, and when McGinn turns away from goal he blows.

I also think that if he DOESN’T give it, he’s not sent to review it by VAR. so we’re lucky he gave it. There was contact, so it was never being overturned by VAR, but I’m not sure the contact was enough that VAR would have intervened had he not given it. Which is how it should be. It’s there for obvious errors, not to correct the refs view of whether contact was “sufficient” for penalty, or not.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37228
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #316 on: December 31, 2023, 01:28:45 PM »
VAR has helped us with our high line, in real time we would have conceded many more from those that have been marginal decisions.


I'm not sure, almost every offside we've won has come with a late flag before being checked, I can only think of a couple since Emery came in that weren't flagged and then got given on VAR.

Offline jon collett

  • Member
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #317 on: December 31, 2023, 01:49:09 PM »
I watched it from the North Stand. To me it looked a clear penalty. Duran was through and impeded.

However Attwell didn’t seem to want to give it (I am still suspicious about his cov affiliations) and only seemed to be persuaded by fact Duran seemed to be seriously injured and was staying down.
« Last Edit: December 31, 2023, 01:52:23 PM by jon collett »

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35529
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #318 on: December 31, 2023, 01:51:37 PM »
Susan, ha!

Online VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12670
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #319 on: December 31, 2023, 01:51:53 PM »
Who's Susan

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75766
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #320 on: December 31, 2023, 01:52:12 PM »
To me it seems Atwell lets play develop to see if there's an advantage as well as give himself a few extra seconds to make a decision. I'd rather that than they make an immediate decision, be it right or wrong or for or against us.

Offline jon collett

  • Member
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #321 on: December 31, 2023, 01:53:11 PM »
Attwell stared at Duran for ages before giving it,


Online VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12670
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #322 on: December 31, 2023, 01:54:00 PM »
I think the ref just took his time with the decision. Then Luiz took his time with the run up and the ball took its time deciding if it was going to go in or not

Offline jon collett

  • Member
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #323 on: December 31, 2023, 02:01:19 PM »
Well the main thing is the result but that was my interpretation from directly above and behind.

For a number of reasons I will now be nervous the next time Attwell refs the Villa!

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #324 on: December 31, 2023, 02:02:38 PM »
Attwell stared at Duran for ages before giving it,



Good looking lad to be fair.

Online brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11072
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #325 on: December 31, 2023, 02:02:51 PM »
It's a pen. You don't have to clatter a player for it to be a foul. Their player was dumb as fuck to do that shirt pull while on a yellow. The only wrong decision was the handball, which was outside the box. I assume it would have been a yellow and a good free kick chance for them. Although a red appearing wouldn't shock me these days.
The contact was minimal, Duran earns the penalty. It has happened against us many times. I am grateful but it doesn’t make it right.

Having seen it again, it doesn't look anything like a penalty to me. The defender mildly touches Duran's foot, which isn't a foul, but Jhon goes down and flips over and over like he's been shot. The contact looked similar to me to the Luiz one against Arsenal which wasn't given against us. Still, we've had enough shit decisions, like Ollie being shoved over, so I'll take anything marginal in our favour.

Dean Smith was the co-commentator on R5 Live.

He said it was never a penalty.

Looked a blatant dive let's be honest. Badly needed three points so we will take it. Would have been a disaster dropping two points yesterday in light of the collapse at Old Trafford.

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47610
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #326 on: December 31, 2023, 02:06:30 PM »
I think the ref just took his time with the decision. Then Luiz took his time with the run up and the ball took its time deciding if it was going to go in or not

And then the ref took his time blowing the final whistle.

Offline Villa Lew

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9076
  • Age: 75
  • GM : 16.08.2026
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #327 on: December 31, 2023, 02:07:00 PM »
Carlos and Lenglet partnership is a concern, though the penalty was not a stonewaller, it was a thoroughly deserved win, the biggest plus for me is Leon, at last he is now fulfilling his potential.

A stat I read that surprised me was this was our first double over Burnley in the league since 1925-26 season.

Offline Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13935
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #328 on: December 31, 2023, 02:09:15 PM »
Carlos and Lenglet partnership is a concern, though the penalty was not a stonewaller, it was a thoroughly deserved win, the biggest plus for me is Leon, at last he is now fulfilling his potential.

A stat I read that surprised me was this was our first double over Burnley in the league since 1925-26 season.

That’s a pretty meaningless stat though isn’t it? How many of those 98 seasons were we actually in the same division?

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63327
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Aston Villa v Burnley Post Match Thread
« Reply #329 on: December 31, 2023, 02:13:15 PM »
Carlos and Lenglet partnership is a concern, though the penalty was not a stonewaller, it was a thoroughly deserved win, the biggest plus for me is Leon, at last he is now fulfilling his potential.

A stat I read that surprised me was this was our first double over Burnley in the league since 1925-26 season.

That’s a pretty meaningless stat though isn’t it? How many of those 98 seasons were we actually in the same division?

Thirty-odd from a quick adding up, and it's 91, not 98.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal