collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by andyh
[Today at 03:54:35 AM]


Carabao Cup 2025/26 - 3rd Round Brentford (a) by andyh
[Today at 03:47:05 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:21:28 AM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:26:19 AM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:00:49 AM]


Tennis 2025 by Villa Lew
[August 27, 2025, 11:35:41 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by Percy McCarthy
[August 27, 2025, 11:34:17 PM]


Aston Villa v Crystal Palace Pre Match by tomd2103
[August 27, 2025, 11:11:15 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread  (Read 24431 times)

Offline rooboy316

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 543
  • Location: Melbourne
  • GM : 24.11.2025
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #135 on: November 13, 2023, 10:03:46 AM »
The ball was dead. I think play will always start with a drop ball when a penalty is given and then rescinded. They'd have to change the protocols to give a corner.

I don't think the referee got much wrong yesterday but he was getting pelters for every decision because of the VAR anger, even when he correctly pulled back a free kick when the ball was moving, for example

So the more equitable way to officiate this type of scenario is to let the ball go out for a corner and then ‘review’ if it was a penalty or not. Otherwise the attacking team is unduly robbed of a corner.

Then you have the scenario of allowing play to continue when it's offside in case there is a goal. And that still riles people up even though it's been four years

I see your point, but am not advocating for it to happen for all penalty shouts when play can go on for some time afterwards, a la offsides. Just for the very specific scenarios where deflections have gone out - it’s presumably an extra second or two delayed before the decision gets made?

Offline brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11259
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #136 on: November 13, 2023, 10:16:16 AM »
I didn't realise Watkins cleared the ball that led to his goal. How fast he bombed forward when Bailey won the ball......

Ollie defends that front post really well these days. We don't concede that many at set piece time despite having very few players strong in the air, good coaching.

Offline Bully2345

  • Member
  • Posts: 755
  • Location: Nottingham
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #137 on: November 13, 2023, 10:32:55 AM »
The ball was dead. I think play will always start with a drop ball when a penalty is given and then rescinded. They'd have to change the protocols to give a corner.

I don't think the referee got much wrong yesterday but he was getting pelters for every decision because of the VAR anger, even when he correctly pulled back a free kick when the ball was moving, for example

So the more equitable way to officiate this type of scenario is to let the ball go out for a corner and then ‘review’ if it was a penalty or not. Otherwise the attacking team is unduly robbed of a corner.

Then you have the scenario of allowing play to continue when it's offside in case there is a goal. And that still riles people up even though it's been four years

I see your point, but am not advocating for it to happen for all penalty shouts when play can go on for some time afterwards, a la offsides. Just for the very specific scenarios where deflections have gone out - it’s presumably an extra second or two delayed before the decision gets made?

I think there's common sense in that but writing the laws of football is pretty difficult to account for all scenarios so I guess they went with dead ball for everything when a penalty is rescinded. It's not perfect admittedly.

What they really need to be better at is explaining decisions in the ground. There was a lot of anger yesterday and most of it stemmed from that penalty scenario even though the referee was fine

Offline Nev

  • Member
  • Posts: 15967
  • Location: Vibrania
  • GM : 03.02.2022
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #138 on: November 13, 2023, 10:44:56 AM »
I thought the ref was poor. He let Fulham get away with that cyclical fouling for the majority of the game, only producing yellows towards the end. I lost count of the times JMG was upended, a card would have certainly reduced this.

This sort of rotational fouling is far more of an issue than dissent or time wasting yet is permitted week after week. As is the delayed offside flag which is massively inconsistent and hugely infuriating.

Offline Lsvilla

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2046
  • GM : 13.08.2026
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #139 on: November 13, 2023, 10:46:08 AM »
Although I agree that the ref did nothing wrong in reversing his decision and awarding the drop ball, I thought it helped get the crowd up early in the game which went on to help the overall atmosphere.

Offline darren woolley

  • Member
  • Posts: 36376
  • Location: London
  • GM : 12.12.2024
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #140 on: November 13, 2023, 11:05:31 AM »
Good win and only three points off the top it's looking good for us.

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42889
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #141 on: November 13, 2023, 11:10:36 AM »
I thought the ref was poor. He let Fulham get away with that cyclical fouling for the majority of the game, only producing yellows towards the end. I lost count of the times JMG was upended, a card would have certainly reduced this.

This sort of rotational fouling is far more of an issue than dissent or time wasting yet is permitted week after week. As is the delayed offside flag which is massively inconsistent and hugely infuriating.

We were talking at the game about the Rugby Union approach of giving a warning to the captain about persistent (rotational) offending and then the next player gets carded, regardless of whether they've committed any previous fouls.

However, as we know from the 'moving a free kick forward 10 metres' experiment of a few years ago and the current refusal to introduce proper head injury assessments, football doesn't like using solutions from rugby.

Offline pablo_picasso

  • Member
  • Posts: 3776
  • GM : 17.11.2024
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #142 on: November 13, 2023, 11:15:57 AM »
Franky
If you could have put one of the chances away early in the second half it could have been a different result.
We looked a bit jaded and your boys played some good stuff after the break, you are really lacking that cutting edge which is a worry.
I think you have enough to visit us next season.
All the best.
your right that the story of our season, never got a reasonable replacement for Mitrovic, few crucial injuries in defence, I think we’ll probably be okay, only because the three promoted teams look pants, and I think all the players that over performed last season are struggling this season
Also.
I think Bassey is very good Centre half.

Cant pass the ball for shit though...

Offline Rigadon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9031
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #143 on: November 13, 2023, 11:59:46 AM »
I thought the ref was poor. He let Fulham get away with that cyclical fouling for the majority of the game, only producing yellows towards the end. I lost count of the times JMG was upended, a card would have certainly reduced this.

This sort of rotational fouling is far more of an issue than dissent or time wasting yet is permitted week after week. As is the delayed offside flag which is massively inconsistent and hugely infuriating.

The delayed flag is maddening, but I was thinking yesterday that so many teams who are now playing the high line are able to do with more certainty than before because in most cases the decision is correct.  Without VAR I doubt those clubs would trust the officials to get marginal calls correct any more than 50% of the time. 

 

Offline London Villan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10954
  • Location: Brum
  • GM : 01.10.2025
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #144 on: November 13, 2023, 12:03:10 PM »
It's more maddening when one linesman does it and the one on the other side doesn't.

How do you fix it though. If it's marginal when do you put up your flag - or do you run the move to its conclusion?

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43920
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #145 on: November 13, 2023, 12:04:41 PM »
I think VAR is essential for us as we deploy a very cute hi line however late flag punishes our clever play. Our defenders have to unnecessarily expand effort to defend illegal play. This is not good and and they need to fix it in favour of good football.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43920
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #146 on: November 13, 2023, 12:07:13 PM »
Although I agree that the ref did nothing wrong in reversing his decision and awarding the drop ball, I thought it helped get the crowd up early in the game which went on to help the overall atmosphere.
The drop ball was wrong as the ball had gone out for a corner but I accept your point and yes it worked in our favour.

Offline Bully2345

  • Member
  • Posts: 755
  • Location: Nottingham
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #147 on: November 13, 2023, 12:07:48 PM »
It's more maddening when one linesman does it and the one on the other side doesn't.

How do you fix it though. If it's marginal when do you put up your flag - or do you run the move to its conclusion?

The guidance is to put the flag up immediately if it's obvious but I have seen more reluctance to put the flag up this season as they're more scared of making mistakes and just pass it to VAR.

Offline ez

  • Member
  • Posts: 9910
  • Location: Stratford on Avon
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #148 on: November 13, 2023, 12:08:06 PM »
I've not seen it mentioned on here and most of us were nonplussed at the time but after the penalty was overturned why did the ref not give us the corner?

it was certainly a talking point in our sections, maybe he saw the ball rebound off Watkins on the replay? Did the ball not hit the defenders arm? I haven't seen it again.

Because once he blew for the penalty, the ball was effectively dead, so the fact that it went out after that didn't mean it was a corner.
I've watched it back. The ref blows after the ball has gone over the goal line. Surely that's the time when the ball is dead.

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18216
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Aston Villa v Fulham Post-Match Thread
« Reply #149 on: November 13, 2023, 12:08:53 PM »
We were talking at the game about the Rugby Union approach of giving a warning to the captain about persistent (rotational) offending and then the next player gets carded, regardless of whether they've committed any previous fouls.
I used to do that when I reffed junior and local-league games. It worked remarkably well in reducing persistent fouling.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal