When we appointed Gerrard part of the reason given was to raise our profile and his appointment would attract top players to the clubTherefore if they sack Gerrard, then the next manager would have to have a similar high profile within the game, so I think if that is the case we can then rule out the likes of Beale, Dyche etc..
Quote from: Beard82 on October 19, 2022, 08:49:36 AMThe problem is, its the judgement in the turns we take. Did anyone seriously think that there wasn't a very high chance that SG appointment would end up like this I think a lot of people called it at the time - the wrong appointment for the wrong reasonsThis got me thinking: as a fanbase has a managerial appointment ever surprised us? When has it been much different to what we expected?O'Neill - Very excited and proved to work out really well until the abrupt endHoullier - I can't really remember the reaction, but I think there were concerns about his age and how committed he would be? I may be misrememberingMcLeish - Dour and uninspiring. I think the only major shock was how it never got personal with him and how long it took for us to get fed up with the footballLambert - This was probably the closest one to the fans getting it wrong. We wanted him so much his name was being chanted while he was employed by our opponents, but it didn't work out. There was that time at the end of his first season/start of his second where it briefly looked like we were going to get the exciting, attacking football that we wanted, but for whatever reason, it disappeared pretty much overnight and it became very boring.Sherwood - He came with the name Tactics Tim for a reason. While I think we all got swept up in the little spell around the cup run, he was never seen as a great manager by the fans, I don't think. Again, I can't really remember the reaction tp his appointment there, I think we were all so relieved to have got rid of Lambert.Garde - I know I got this one wrong, because I was excited. But I think I was in the minority. He ended up doing a very difficult job badly.Di Matteo - I was in the 'anyone other than Pearson' camp, but I think the general consensus was that it was a pretty uninspiring appointment. His appointment was a little overshadowed by the takeover, as far as I can remember.Bruce - "it could be worse I guess" seemed to be the general reaction. Not inspiring at all, but could work out in the short term. That pretty much sums up what happened.Smith - Again, I think we were generally quite excited. Someone that we could really get behind and would try to play attacking football, which we were crying out for.Gerrard - A lot of us were worried abut his inexperience, his overreliance on Beale, his Liverpool connection/stepping stone, the fact that he hadn't been that successful at Rangers. He was a long way down people's list of managers, and in a Yes or No vote, it was a pretty convincing No.Now, I'm not saying that the club should take a vote on who the next manager should be (we'd end up with Ashley Young), but I am suggesting that this site always knows exactly how things are going to pan out and we should be part of the interviewing process.
The problem is, its the judgement in the turns we take. Did anyone seriously think that there wasn't a very high chance that SG appointment would end up like this I think a lot of people called it at the time - the wrong appointment for the wrong reasons
My feeling with Houllier was that it would have been a great appointment ten years earlier. Hiring a guy with a serious health issue was concerning, high risk and, potentially, very short term. I started doubting Lerner and his "nous" from that moment on.
Have you seen more half-hearted and dispirited body language?https://twitter.com/AVFCOfficial/status/1582390665627176960?t=FEqGkC1oF8JhPjtGAuHtvg&s=19