collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by Steve67
[Today at 10:18:46 PM]


Diego Carlos by RichardBatchelor
[Today at 10:18:43 PM]


Moussa Diaby - Confirmed by Risso
[Today at 10:18:07 PM]


Robin Olsen by RichardBatchelor
[Today at 10:16:50 PM]


Aston Villa v Chelsea Match Thread by Goldenballs
[Today at 10:11:40 PM]


Other Games - 2023/24 by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 10:04:00 PM]


John McGinn - signed (Captain) by Footy-Vill
[Today at 09:51:55 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Crest Review  (Read 280074 times)

Online Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28981
  • Age: 52
  • Location: My own little world.
  • GM : 10.10.2024
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1245 on: November 10, 2022, 05:12:28 PM »
And having just seen it on the Official App, it looks so much better than the current one.

Offline chrisw1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9287
  • GM : 20.08.2024
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1246 on: November 10, 2022, 05:13:54 PM »
Fair enough.  Pissed off about the cleverclogs who suggested the twatting lamp design that took the place of the very sensible stand alone lion, but the outcome was all very predictable from the moment it was announced.

FWIW I think the final design is better than any fan versions I saw, save for the star (another fan led error), the strange decision to turn it round and maybe not including 1894.

Online Villan82

  • Member
  • Posts: 3349
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1247 on: November 10, 2022, 05:15:42 PM »
And having just seen it on the Official App, it looks so much better than the current one.

New one has: better lion, better representation of our colours now, contains our full name, is a nod to our history and is looking to the future. They did quite well with this.

The negativity here simply baffles me.

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 71362
  • GM : 26.08.2024
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1248 on: November 10, 2022, 05:17:23 PM »
I can only assume 2% is spoiled ballots/votes. Maybe

Errrrrr

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61464
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2025
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1249 on: November 10, 2022, 05:20:05 PM »
The percentages do make sense. Everyone had to vote for one of the two options, and their respective scores add up to 100%. Regardless of how you voted in the first bit, you were also allowed to specify whether you'd rather keep the current badge and 8% chose to do so. That's a separate question.

They have worded it so it looks like 108% of people voted, though.

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54336
  • Age: 51
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 22.07.2024
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1250 on: November 10, 2022, 05:23:55 PM »
I can only assume 2% is spoiled ballots/votes. Maybe

Errrrrr

It was 98% of the 2 choices on offer I assumed

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 85502
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1251 on: November 10, 2022, 05:35:24 PM »

FWIW I think the final design is better than any fan versions I saw, save for the star (another fan led error), the strange decision to turn it round and maybe not including 1894.

Errrrrr

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 71362
  • GM : 26.08.2024
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1252 on: November 10, 2022, 05:37:55 PM »
I can only assume 2% is spoiled ballots/votes. Maybe

Errrrrr

It was 98% of the 2 choices on offer I assumed

It adds up to 108% though

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 85502
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1253 on: November 10, 2022, 05:41:01 PM »
I can only assume 2% is spoiled ballots/votes. Maybe

Errrrrr

It was 98% of the 2 choices on offer I assumed

It adds up to 108% though

It wasn't a three way vote though. It was one of the two new designs, *or* keep with the old. So I think it's of the people who voted to change (ie 92% of everybody who voted), 77% went for the rounds, and 23% for the lantern. Just badly worded I think.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 68461
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1254 on: November 10, 2022, 05:42:05 PM »
I assumed TV was doing a play on 110%, turns out he's just shit at maths!

Offline The Man With A Stick

  • Member
  • Posts: 13031
  • Location: Lichfield
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1255 on: November 10, 2022, 05:48:25 PM »
And having just seen it on the Official App, it looks so much better than the current one.

New one has: better lion, better representation of our colours now, contains our full name, is a nod to our history and is looking to the future. They did quite well with this.

The negativity here simply baffles me.

I think it'll look great when we see it on a new kit next summer.  It's miles better than the current rubbish, which just reminds me of countless years of underachievement and missed opportunities.

Offline Nii Lamptey

  • Member
  • Posts: 2274
  • Age: 48
  • Location: Kidderminster
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1256 on: November 10, 2022, 06:49:23 PM »
Thank the lord we didn't end up with that lantern clusterfuck. Design was all over the place...

Most fans wouldn't see the connection with the lamp, and it just looks like a shite shield (or the silhouette of Doctor Who's tardis!). What we've ended up with is a modern take of the badge from our most successful era, that isn't anywhere near as cluttered as 'the other round badges', whilst also ditching the majority of that insipid yellow!

V happy with that. Also, not bothered by the direction of the lion - My only complaint is that ridiculously placed star!

Offline Pete3206

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17137
  • Location: Erdington
  • GM : PCM
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1257 on: November 10, 2022, 07:02:12 PM »
I've said this before but I cannot believe that after all the consultation, the lamp rubbish was an actual option. The decision was already made when they published that video.

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 71362
  • GM : 26.08.2024
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1258 on: November 10, 2022, 07:32:29 PM »
I've said this before but I cannot believe that after all the consultation, the lamp rubbish was an actual option. The decision was already made when they published that video.

Yeah, I reckon you're right.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 68461
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Crest Review
« Reply #1259 on: November 10, 2022, 07:34:24 PM »
Amount of shite on Twitter etc about us copying Chelsea. Ignoring that we were using the lion 20 years before Chelsea were even formed. 1900s wankers.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal