I'd cash in this summer get as much as possible .
Quote from: VillaTim on July 12, 2025, 11:08:52 AMI'd cash in this summer get as much as possible .I just dont think we are in a strong enough position squad wise, to be selling Kamara now. He’s got two years left, this gives us the opportunity of having him for this year and still being able to sell him next summer if he wont sign on the dotted line. I also think we have a quality player in Bogarde, who with another year of development, could be the real deal in that position.
Quote from: brontebilly on July 11, 2025, 03:12:46 PMI know Kamara has previous on it but I think CL football and getting into the France team would surely trump running down his contract with us.Why can't he do both?Run his contract (which, let's not forget, still has two years on it) down AND play well and push to get into the French team?
I know Kamara has previous on it but I think CL football and getting into the France team would surely trump running down his contract with us.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on July 11, 2025, 03:35:52 PMQuote from: brontebilly on July 11, 2025, 03:12:46 PMI know Kamara has previous on it but I think CL football and getting into the France team would surely trump running down his contract with us.Why can't he do both?Run his contract (which, let's not forget, still has two years on it) down AND play well and push to get into the French team?To state the obvious but we can't offer him CL football. CL football rather than Europa Thursdays more likely to get him into a star studded French team for the WC. I'm assuming he's in their squad either way if fit.
Quote from: LeonW on July 12, 2025, 03:02:09 AMQuote from: Tokyo Sexwhale on July 11, 2025, 08:31:22 PMQuote from: Rudy Can't Fail on July 11, 2025, 03:46:15 PMLetting him go for free would today equal losing the equivalent of 14% of our turnover based on a sale of £50m. To put that in perspective, Heck's price increases of the Champions League games was said to have raised an additional total of £900k.We wouldn't let him go for free today, we'd be letting him go for free in 2 years time after we've (hopefully) had two more years of high-level play from him. Given that we got him for free, he'd be neutral in the books.If we sold him today for £50m, we would probably have to spend at least that for someone 80% as good as Kamara, plus the added costs and risks of acquiring and integrating any new player.There's no guarantee that Onana and/or Barrenechea can replace him at the same level.But it’s the headroom we’d also benefit from by selling him. The owners want to spend the money but can’t right now because of the rules. Even £50m from a free transfer would be very much welcomed to give us more flexibility to operate in the transfer market. If he’s not going to sign his new contract we should sell him.“ we should sell him”But what if he doesn’t want to be sold right now?
Quote from: Tokyo Sexwhale on July 11, 2025, 08:31:22 PMQuote from: Rudy Can't Fail on July 11, 2025, 03:46:15 PMLetting him go for free would today equal losing the equivalent of 14% of our turnover based on a sale of £50m. To put that in perspective, Heck's price increases of the Champions League games was said to have raised an additional total of £900k.We wouldn't let him go for free today, we'd be letting him go for free in 2 years time after we've (hopefully) had two more years of high-level play from him. Given that we got him for free, he'd be neutral in the books.If we sold him today for £50m, we would probably have to spend at least that for someone 80% as good as Kamara, plus the added costs and risks of acquiring and integrating any new player.There's no guarantee that Onana and/or Barrenechea can replace him at the same level.But it’s the headroom we’d also benefit from by selling him. The owners want to spend the money but can’t right now because of the rules. Even £50m from a free transfer would be very much welcomed to give us more flexibility to operate in the transfer market. If he’s not going to sign his new contract we should sell him.
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on July 11, 2025, 03:46:15 PMLetting him go for free would today equal losing the equivalent of 14% of our turnover based on a sale of £50m. To put that in perspective, Heck's price increases of the Champions League games was said to have raised an additional total of £900k.We wouldn't let him go for free today, we'd be letting him go for free in 2 years time after we've (hopefully) had two more years of high-level play from him. Given that we got him for free, he'd be neutral in the books.If we sold him today for £50m, we would probably have to spend at least that for someone 80% as good as Kamara, plus the added costs and risks of acquiring and integrating any new player.There's no guarantee that Onana and/or Barrenechea can replace him at the same level.
Letting him go for free would today equal losing the equivalent of 14% of our turnover based on a sale of £50m. To put that in perspective, Heck's price increases of the Champions League games was said to have raised an additional total of £900k.
https://x.com/J_Tanswell/status/1946297759121756583?t=yqeMCLdbq5Z-wzV2OXfYDQ&s=19
Monchi will sell him for £5m next week.