Summer 2022 Transfer Thread

[curiousorange]

What is the point of re-signing Young? - I don't see many instances where he'd be the right guy to start a game or even come on as sub.
I'm guessing it's the 'senior squad' member' argument (even though he now has Carlos and August in as experienced international footballers as role models to the younger players).

He can play in several positions at a pinch, he sets a good example in training, he’s an experienced voice in the dressing room, Gerrard trusts him, and he doesn’t cost the earth.

Your keys words are 'at a pinch'.
Also, do we know how much he costs?


(I'm not too hung up about this, btw, but I do want to see players progress in the squad without an old 'blocker' in the way).

I think he’s Gerrard’s representative in the dressing room. He’s there to set the right example, pass on his experience and  provide cover for 2 or 3 positions when called on. He’s had a long and successful career by maximising his abilities and always being a team player.

I'm sure he's fine with it, but it makes me somewhat sad that Young went from being a hell of a winger to a utility full-back.

[nigel]

What is the point of re-signing Young? - I don't see many instances where he'd be the right guy to start a game or even come on as sub.
I'm guessing it's the 'senior squad' member' argument (even though he now has Carlos and August in as experienced international footballers as role models to the younger players).

I wonder if it’s because Carney has mentioned he’s a big influence for him?

[Clark W Griswold]

What is the point of re-signing Young? - I don't see many instances where he'd be the right guy to start a game or even come on as sub.
I'm guessing it's the 'senior squad' member' argument (even though he now has Carlos and August in as experienced international footballers as role models to the younger players).

He can play in several positions at a pinch, he sets a good example in training, he’s an experienced voice in the dressing room, Gerrard trusts him, and he doesn’t cost the earth.

Your keys words are 'at a pinch'.
Also, do we know how much he costs?


(I'm not too hung up about this, btw, but I do want to see players progress in the squad without an old 'blocker' in the way).

I think he’s Gerrard’s representative in the dressing room. He’s there to set the right example, pass on his experience and  provide cover for 2 or 3 positions when called on. He’s had a long and successful career by maximising his abilities and always being a team player.

I'm sure he's fine with it, but it makes me somewhat sad that Young went from being a hell of a winger to a utility full-back.

Circumstances dictate, not least his age.
A lot of players are finished at 33/34.

[dave shelley]

What age is this cat, St Augustine ?

When I looked him up last night I think it said he was twenty-eight.

[OCD]

Loan with an option to buy for £4.5m for a Swedish regular who played a lot of games for Sevilla last season looks like really good business.

[jwarry]

What is the point of re-signing Young? - I don't see many instances where he'd be the right guy to start a game or even come on as sub.
I'm guessing it's the 'senior squad' member' argument (even though he now has Carlos and August in as experienced international footballers as role models to the younger players).

He can play in several positions at a pinch, he sets a good example in training, he’s an experienced voice in the dressing room, Gerrard trusts him, and he doesn’t cost the earth.

Your keys words are 'at a pinch'.
Also, do we know how much he costs?


(I'm not too hung up about this, btw, but I do want to see players progress in the squad without an old 'blocker' in the way).

I think he’s Gerrard’s representative in the dressing room. He’s there to set the right example, pass on his experience and  provide cover for 2 or 3 positions when called on. He’s had a long and successful career by maximising his abilities and always being a team player.

I'm sure he's fine with it, but it makes me somewhat sad that Young went from being a hell of a winger to a utility full-back.

Circumstances dictate, not least his age.
A lot of players are finished at 33/34.

I suspect he has been given a contract simply because of the encouragement he gives to the youngsters, both on and off the pitch.  I expect he’s taken the contract knowing he will have little game time but is developing his pathway to coaching and management.  So all in all a no brainer

[Footy-Vill]

One of £25m Sander Berge, £20m Harry Winks at midfield
And £20m Emmanuel Dennis, as a forward.

They would all likely increase the fight for first team positions and ensure that there was no quality loss when they are rotated in and out. They would be  providing a challenge to what we have in the squad and are realistic targets, who are available at suitable transfer prices.

[Footy-Vill]

What is the point of re-signing Young? - I don't see many instances where he'd be the right guy to start a game or even come on as sub.
I'm guessing it's the 'senior squad' member' argument (even though he now has Carlos and August in as experienced international footballers as role models to the younger players).

On the Ashley Young thread, it is explained. Your question was addressed by Gerrard.

[Lsvilla]

One of £25m Sander Berge, £20m Harry Winks at midfield
And £20m Emmanuel Dennis, as a forward.

They would all likely increase the fight for first team positions and ensure that there was no quality loss when they are rotated in and out. They would be  providing a challenge to what we have in the squad and are realistic targets, who are available at suitable transfer prices.

One of £25m Sander Berge, £20m Harry Winks at midfield
And £20m Emmanuel Dennis, as a forward.

They would all likely increase the fight for first team positions and ensure that there was no quality loss when they are rotated in and out. They would be  providing a challenge to what we have in the squad and are realistic targets, who are available at suitable transfer prices.

It may just be me - but I see these three as towards the top of the list of players to avoid. Played okay for teams that couldn't compete in the premier league. Or sat on the bench a lot for a team that did compete. On that latter basis it is possible that Winks may have something but there must be better options than him and the other two surely.

[Footy-Vill]

Augustinsson And Chambers at their previous clubs weren't even automatic starters.

[PaulWinch again]

Augustinsson And Chambers at their previous clubs weren't even automatic starters.

I might have missed the point here?

[Lsvilla]

Augustinsson And Chambers at their previous clubs weren't even automatic starters.

And their fees ?

[Brazilian Villain]

One of £25m Sander Berge, £20m Harry Winks at midfield
And £20m Emmanuel Dennis, as a forward.

It may just be me - but I see these three as towards the top of the list of players to avoid.

I agree with you. The weather is glorious today so I think F-V might have had a cheeky Sunday vino or two and why not? 

[Footy-Vill]

Augustinsson And Chambers at their previous clubs weren't even automatic starters.

And their fees ?

Well, those in comparison are undoubtedly wise financial decisions.

[Footy-Vill]

One of £25m Sander Berge, £20m Harry Winks at midfield
And £20m Emmanuel Dennis, as a forward.

It may just be me - but I see these three as towards the top of the list of players to avoid.

I agree with you. The weather is glorious today so I think F-V might have had a cheeky Sunday vino or two and why not? 

That those three players are at the top of the list to avoid out of ALL the players in the world just seems people being cruel to me. However, I understand your reasoning regarding Berge, Winks and Dennis. And respect that despite harshness on my suggested selections (as they are players we've been linked with).

Moving to the side then of this then.
So acording to what I've heard, unvaccinated players are the ones to stay away from the most.
One of them is supposedly Ruben Loftus Cheek at Chelsea.
There are Premier League clubs who are unable to move on players due to their unvaccinated status.