Quote from: LeonW on June 03, 2022, 08:07:35 AMQuote from: cdbearsfan on June 03, 2022, 01:43:54 AMThere was a three foreigners rule but way back in the nineties, as I recall. It became largely pointless when the EU adopted Freedom of Movement meaning they couldn't enforce it. It may have stumbled on for a little while being basically, as you say, three non-EU players but got scrapped eventually.I think it only applied in European competition anyway, I remember we had to drop Bosnich and maybe one or two others for one of the Inter games but we could always play as many non-English players as we liked in the league.‘‘Twas a strange rule for sure. Domestically, Welsh, Scottish, Irish players, etc, fill your boots. But in European competition? Apparently not; they were classed as foreigners. Very confusing to me as one entity (FA or UEFA) didn’t seem to be working things correctly. If someone could explain the differentials I’d quite like to know. I think it's something to do with the Home Countries' insistence on having separate seats on the FIFA (or UEFA) board. The idea being that the rest of the world thinks that England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland ought to compete under a UK banner, but the British associations do not. Hence them insisting that, if the international teams are separate, so are the players' registrations. Or something.
Quote from: cdbearsfan on June 03, 2022, 01:43:54 AMThere was a three foreigners rule but way back in the nineties, as I recall. It became largely pointless when the EU adopted Freedom of Movement meaning they couldn't enforce it. It may have stumbled on for a little while being basically, as you say, three non-EU players but got scrapped eventually.I think it only applied in European competition anyway, I remember we had to drop Bosnich and maybe one or two others for one of the Inter games but we could always play as many non-English players as we liked in the league.‘‘Twas a strange rule for sure. Domestically, Welsh, Scottish, Irish players, etc, fill your boots. But in European competition? Apparently not; they were classed as foreigners. Very confusing to me as one entity (FA or UEFA) didn’t seem to be working things correctly. If someone could explain the differentials I’d quite like to know.
There was a three foreigners rule but way back in the nineties, as I recall. It became largely pointless when the EU adopted Freedom of Movement meaning they couldn't enforce it. It may have stumbled on for a little while being basically, as you say, three non-EU players but got scrapped eventually.I think it only applied in European competition anyway, I remember we had to drop Bosnich and maybe one or two others for one of the Inter games but we could always play as many non-English players as we liked in the league.
Quote from: villadelph on June 03, 2022, 04:55:53 PMQuote from: Dante Lavelli on June 03, 2022, 04:53:54 PMQuote from: clash city rocker on June 03, 2022, 04:12:23 PMWe just need a 20+ goals a season striker now. Any ideas ? Plus can't cost more than £60 m.Those players are very rare nowadays. Three, maybe four players getting 10+ should be the objective.We did that with the Greasy Joe money. We need a proper striker now. Not a hard worker, not a team player, not one for the future - a proper striker. Watkins and Ings missed enough very decent chances to give us 10-15 more points last season. Signing a genuine 20-25 goal a season striker immediately takes pressure off the defence too. They cost a fair whack though, and are pretty hard to find.
Quote from: Dante Lavelli on June 03, 2022, 04:53:54 PMQuote from: clash city rocker on June 03, 2022, 04:12:23 PMWe just need a 20+ goals a season striker now. Any ideas ? Plus can't cost more than £60 m.Those players are very rare nowadays. Three, maybe four players getting 10+ should be the objective.We did that with the Greasy Joe money. We need a proper striker now. Not a hard worker, not a team player, not one for the future - a proper striker.
Quote from: clash city rocker on June 03, 2022, 04:12:23 PMWe just need a 20+ goals a season striker now. Any ideas ? Plus can't cost more than £60 m.Those players are very rare nowadays. Three, maybe four players getting 10+ should be the objective.
We just need a 20+ goals a season striker now. Any ideas ? Plus can't cost more than £60 m.
Quote from: ozzjim on June 03, 2022, 11:10:33 PMQuote from: villadelph on June 03, 2022, 04:55:53 PMQuote from: Dante Lavelli on June 03, 2022, 04:53:54 PMQuote from: clash city rocker on June 03, 2022, 04:12:23 PMWe just need a 20+ goals a season striker now. Any ideas ? Plus can't cost more than £60 m.Those players are very rare nowadays. Three, maybe four players getting 10+ should be the objective.We did that with the Greasy Joe money. We need a proper striker now. Not a hard worker, not a team player, not one for the future - a proper striker. Watkins and Ings missed enough very decent chances to give us 10-15 more points last season. Signing a genuine 20-25 goal a season striker immediately takes pressure off the defence too. They cost a fair whack though, and are pretty hard to find.Yes we need to find one of those mythical strikers that never ever misses any chances. We will, of course, ignore games like Brighton where Watkins took the ball from his own half and smashed it in. Or Newcastle where Ings scored an overhead kick.Watkins scored 11, expected goals 11.23. Ings scored 7. Expected goals 7.6. I doubt those 0.83 goals would have got us 10-15 points.The idea that they're constantly missing chances is a false narrative. Create more chances and they'll score more goals. Start by picking Buendia and Coutinho in the same team more often.
It's not so much Ollie's shooting that lets him down, more that his unreliable touch so often wastes promising positions. He'd get more clear-cut chances - and score more goals - if his technique was consistently better. Having said that, I agree that every striker misses chances, and the most consistent ones are worth stupid money.
Just clone them together then.
There is some gremlins on social media that our Steven is after Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. Has anyone on here heard anything of the sort? I do hope there is absolutely no truth in this at all as he's total waste.
I wouldn't worry about any links tbf, Our business since NSWE came in has taught me that the press have no idea who we are after until its pretty much done.