Quote from: PaulWinch again on January 10, 2022, 10:16:04 PMOliver was poor but I think the VAR call is systemic as much as anything. Once the referee gets summoned over to the monitor there’s an expectation that the decision will change. The stats on that would be interesting.Ultimately we need to be more efficient at taking our chances. Even with that decision we should have won that game.If the ref is called over to the monitor it means he can put the responsibility (and blame) on VAR for the decision. This is one of the biggest problems of the current system.
Oliver was poor but I think the VAR call is systemic as much as anything. Once the referee gets summoned over to the monitor there’s an expectation that the decision will change. The stats on that would be interesting.Ultimately we need to be more efficient at taking our chances. Even with that decision we should have won that game.
What game were you watching….?! Yes we were robbed. But bar about 10mins in the first half we battered them for the whole match. Yes there were some misplaced passes but there was a lot of cb good football. (Forgot to quote. Replying to earlier poster who gave everyone 4 out of 10 basically)
Doesn't make any different If Canvani isn't getting to the ball,it shows he being blocked,we have got to learn quickly, like them fouling, instead of discussing it with the referees and opposition players take the free kick quickly
Ming's or Konsoa getting blamed for the there goal, have a look again, Douglas Luiz let him run
Does El Ghazi do anything else except shoot when he gets the ball on the edge of the box. He must have more goals for Villa than assists.
Yes we wasted chances but it really doesn't matter. When we score they'll simply chalk it off or award them their customary penalty. We only won there last time around because that dickhead missed the penalty.
Quote from: LeonW on January 10, 2022, 10:17:28 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on January 10, 2022, 10:16:04 PMOliver was poor but I think the VAR call is systemic as much as anything. Once the referee gets summoned over to the monitor there’s an expectation that the decision will change. The stats on that would be interesting.Ultimately we need to be more efficient at taking our chances. Even with that decision we should have won that game.If the ref is called over to the monitor it means he can put the responsibility (and blame) on VAR for the decision. This is one of the biggest problems of the current system.No, it's still the ref's decision. Calls to go to the monitor are for cases where VAR think the ref has missed something, or think he's made a mistake. VAR can only make calls on matters of fact, like ball over the line, or player offside. For matters of opinion, or "interpretation" of the laws, the ref's decision is still final - so the ref could visit the monitor, watch a replay and still go "nah, I'm happy with my decision", but they never do because they know VAR is convinced they've made a mistake by that point.
I said to my Son before the game that we wouldn't be allowed to win. It fucking stinks. We'll batter the bastards on Saturday.