collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Boxing 2022  (Read 42153 times)

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15475
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #45 on: February 26, 2022, 10:24:12 PM »
Could be an upset on the cards here.  Some might not have given Taylor a round yet.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15475
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #46 on: February 26, 2022, 10:29:36 PM »
 ;Unless Catterall blows up here, can't see Taylor turning it round.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63473
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #47 on: February 26, 2022, 10:37:10 PM »
I think it'll be too one-sided to be good, but Taylor will be worth watching.

Every bloody time.

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7146
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #48 on: February 26, 2022, 10:40:00 PM »
I think it'll be too one-sided to be good, but Taylor will be worth watching.

Every bloody time.

Me too Dave :-)

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15475
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #49 on: February 26, 2022, 10:40:11 PM »
Taylor surely needs a stoppage.

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7146
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #50 on: February 26, 2022, 10:44:09 PM »
Don’t think the ref would take much encouragement to stop him if Taylor does tag him in next couple of rounds

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15475
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #51 on: February 26, 2022, 10:58:32 PM »
Oh that is an absolute fucking disgrace.

Offline Villa Lew

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9136
  • Age: 75
  • GM : 16.08.2026
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #52 on: February 26, 2022, 10:59:25 PM »
That's a joke of a decision

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #53 on: February 26, 2022, 10:59:48 PM »
What a disgrace that was. Fuck me.

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7146
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #54 on: February 26, 2022, 11:00:54 PM »
Thought commentators were going OTT on Catterall being miles ahead as 5/6/7 rounds were flip of coin decisions but over 12 rounds he was surely 2/3 clear

Online Lsvilla

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2057
  • GM : 13.08.2026
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #55 on: February 26, 2022, 11:01:12 PM »
No. Surely not. Amazing. Corrupt. Insane.

Offline Rory

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10193
  • GM : PCM
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #56 on: February 26, 2022, 11:01:19 PM »
What a decision!

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #57 on: February 26, 2022, 11:01:21 PM »
That’s a shocker.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #58 on: February 26, 2022, 11:02:57 PM »
These sort of decisions are what kill boxing.

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7146
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: Boxing 2022
« Reply #59 on: February 26, 2022, 11:04:52 PM »
Always seems to be the British refs / judges that are iffy when it comes to scorecards

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal