Quote from: VILLA MOLE on December 05, 2021, 09:56:34 PMQuote from: Jon Crofts on December 05, 2021, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: ROBBO on December 05, 2021, 09:35:05 PMI'm going to disagree with everyone, to the letter of the law once is hand is on top of the ball he was deemed to be in posession, I might not tike it but that's what it says. Cash needs to spend many hours practising crossing the ball, very wasteful, Marvelous was Marvelous and was impressed with Chuks cameo. Thought both teams were in a battle to see who could give the ball away the most in the first half but Villa were dominant in the second, the only complaint I have is that we missed some very easy chances to put the game away.It’s not possession, it’s control, which if you consider being in control means having one hand on a ball for a tenth of a second then you crack on. Also it doesn’t apply after making a save ? it is all abit ambiguous. When did it change from 2 hands on the ball?It's not really that ambiguous as the rule states that the keeper is deemed to be in control of the ball if, "the ball is between the hands or between the hand and any surface (e.g. ground, own body) or by touching it with any part of the hands or arms except if the ball rebounds accidentally from the goalkeeper or the goalkeeper has made a save".The bit in bold is the key for me and it is why the goal should have stood.
Quote from: Jon Crofts on December 05, 2021, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: ROBBO on December 05, 2021, 09:35:05 PMI'm going to disagree with everyone, to the letter of the law once is hand is on top of the ball he was deemed to be in posession, I might not tike it but that's what it says. Cash needs to spend many hours practising crossing the ball, very wasteful, Marvelous was Marvelous and was impressed with Chuks cameo. Thought both teams were in a battle to see who could give the ball away the most in the first half but Villa were dominant in the second, the only complaint I have is that we missed some very easy chances to put the game away.It’s not possession, it’s control, which if you consider being in control means having one hand on a ball for a tenth of a second then you crack on. Also it doesn’t apply after making a save ? it is all abit ambiguous. When did it change from 2 hands on the ball?
Quote from: ROBBO on December 05, 2021, 09:35:05 PMI'm going to disagree with everyone, to the letter of the law once is hand is on top of the ball he was deemed to be in posession, I might not tike it but that's what it says. Cash needs to spend many hours practising crossing the ball, very wasteful, Marvelous was Marvelous and was impressed with Chuks cameo. Thought both teams were in a battle to see who could give the ball away the most in the first half but Villa were dominant in the second, the only complaint I have is that we missed some very easy chances to put the game away.It’s not possession, it’s control, which if you consider being in control means having one hand on a ball for a tenth of a second then you crack on.
I'm going to disagree with everyone, to the letter of the law once is hand is on top of the ball he was deemed to be in posession, I might not tike it but that's what it says. Cash needs to spend many hours practising crossing the ball, very wasteful, Marvelous was Marvelous and was impressed with Chuks cameo. Thought both teams were in a battle to see who could give the ball away the most in the first half but Villa were dominant in the second, the only complaint I have is that we missed some very easy chances to put the game away.
Leicester fans showing humility.KopfkinoKopfkinoPosted 9 hours agoShouldn’t be losing to shit like that, second half every bit as bad as the first half on Wednesday. It’s beyond embarrassing defensively now. The commentators are actively taking the piss out of us.Like 1 Quote LestaFox92LestaFox92Posted 9 hours agoJust really getting bored of how weak we are at set pieces it's so obvious, hurts even more because villa really aren't even good this season losing grealish and barkley has turned them into a better version of burnley.