He did Clive, but the cross landed 25 yards from the byline. It would have been some header, or volley from that cross. When they shout 'pull it back', I don't think they quite expected to be pulled that far back (haha).
Cash played well today , up there with Bizot and Mings
Quote from: Steve67 on Today at 09:31:40 AMHe did Clive, but the cross landed 25 yards from the byline. It would have been some header, or volley from that cross. When they shout 'pull it back', I don't think they quite expected to be pulled that far back (haha).Cheers Steve but I was referring to the cross that ended up with the red card. People seem to be solely blaming Cash for the Konsa red card
Quote from: Steve67 on Today at 09:24:24 AMQuote from: PaulWinch again on Today at 09:23:38 AMIt was a poor cross, it doesn’t explain why they’d all sprinted towards the 6 yard box.Because they were expecting a better cross. If every time in a game a misplaced cross lead to conceding we’d be seeing 30 goals a game.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on Today at 09:23:38 AMIt was a poor cross, it doesn’t explain why they’d all sprinted towards the 6 yard box.Because they were expecting a better cross.
It was a poor cross, it doesn’t explain why they’d all sprinted towards the 6 yard box.
It's not really about that cross yesterday - as has been repeatedly highlighted, everyone makes bad passes/crosses sometimes - the problem is that he can't be trusted to do anything useful with a football.
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on Today at 10:05:48 AMIt's not really about that cross yesterday - as has been repeatedly highlighted, everyone makes bad passes/crosses sometimes - the problem is that he can't be trusted to do anything useful with a football.Which is massive hyperbole. Also not wishing to go over again, but there was plenty of commentary on here about that specific cross being the reason for the red card above all else.On the more general point, clearly ideally we’d have better than Cash but it’s not as terrible as some make out.