He’s perfectly good enough when Unai doesn’t have a brain fart like yesterday.
He's nowhere near good enough if we want to be fighting for top four, regardless of in a back 4 or 5. He slows our play down dramatically, can't cross, is not a good defender and it always feels like he's got a penalty concession in him. Right back is a priority position for me in the summer (even allowing for the new kid), along with DM and backup striker.
We are always going to be up against it when the game plan seems to be for Cash (and whatever left back is on) to have to dribble around two player in our defensive third to make any progress up the field. He didn't play well, he wasn't alone in that but Unai didn't do him any favours.
I guess the options were either Rogers in Ramsey's spot, or Tim in midfield. Both of which would probably have been better. Cash in a 5 is always a stupid idea.Spurs away - absolute garbage until halftime when Emery sees it's not working.Liverpool away - dreadfulForest away - awfulBrentford away - terrible until the idea gets binned, and then we end up winningSpurs at home yesterday - disasterWhen Emery bangs on about learning from the mistakes, how about having a look at the last time he tried that experiment against the very same team?
I'm not talking about his overall record Ian, just reacting to a basic and very obvious error. He was really chippy with the reporter who asked him about the change to 5 at the back in the post match interview, saying only "we've played it before." Yes we have, and nearly every single time it's been an absolute load of rubbish. Yesterday wasn't a blip, it was absolute carnage.