collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 510276 times)

Online Tuscans

  • Member
  • Posts: 8153
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Newport, South Wales
  • GM : 08.02.15
Re: FFP
« Reply #3765 on: January 07, 2025, 07:35:53 PM »
I caught the end of  something on Talksport where they said Chelsea had sold their womens team to themselves, ehh ? how does that work ?
Sold it to their parent company. As long as they haven't inflated the price, which we're all waiting to see in the account when they're published, they can do that.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2025, 07:37:28 PM by Tuscans »

Online Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12191
Re: FFP
« Reply #3766 on: January 07, 2025, 07:37:47 PM »
We should do what Forest did. Bought a load of players. Broke the rules. Got fined and docked points. Stayed up. Kept the players and are now benefitting from breaking the rules.

Said this as well got laughed at by a few posters. The whole FFP is a mockery

It’s still a laughable suggestion (I’m not convinced Toronto is 100% serious), they don’t just give points based on how much you’ve gone over. We’d have been punished for just ignoring the rules, Forest argued they just got the timing slightly wrong.

Edit - I see Dave has made the point better than I have

Nah we just need to be clever about it and high priced lawyers to find loopholes and drag it out. Making a mockery out of what is already a mockery. I’m not being serious, but the rules are flawed. The fact that Man City and Chelsea have done what they have and yes, Forest to a degree means that for minor penalties they get to keep their better or best players. We end up having to sell Doug and bring in players, most who are on loan or below the needed standard to keep us moving forward.

I dont think its a laughable suggestion as other teams are doing dodgy  things with minimal  to no punishments. If that wasnt the case fair dos.

But as we have both said get good lawyers and you could probably  get away with it

Online Olneythelonely

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8829
  • Location: Selly Park
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: FFP
« Reply #3767 on: January 07, 2025, 08:01:37 PM »
Do you think Wes and Nas having some local ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers?

Online Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12191
Re: FFP
« Reply #3768 on: January 07, 2025, 08:19:47 PM »
Do you think Wes and Nas having some local ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers?

You dont think city or chelsea dont have top lawyers?

Online Beard82

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4819
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Suffolk
  • GM : 07.12.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #3769 on: January 07, 2025, 08:26:08 PM »
Do you think Wes and Nas having some local ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers?

You dont think city or chelsea dont have top lawyers?
I've heard that Dave @ claims direct is very good

Online lovejoy

  • Member
  • Posts: 9534
  • Location: Haywards Heath
Re: FFP
« Reply #3770 on: January 07, 2025, 08:29:48 PM »
Better call Dave.

Online Olneythelonely

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8829
  • Location: Selly Park
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: FFP
« Reply #3771 on: January 07, 2025, 09:12:33 PM »
Do you think Wes and Nas having some local ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers?

You dont think city or chelsea dont have top lawyers?

Erm, huh?

Online Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12191
Re: FFP
« Reply #3772 on: January 07, 2025, 09:22:37 PM »
Better call Dave.

Better call olneytheloney

Heard he works alone

Offline jon collett

  • Member
  • Posts: 1044
Re: FFP
« Reply #3773 on: January 07, 2025, 09:23:25 PM »
Do you think Wes and Nas having some local ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers?

You dont think city or chelsea dont have top lawyers?

City’s top inhouse lawyer is a Villa supporter!

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35648
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #3774 on: January 07, 2025, 09:51:18 PM »
Do you think Wes and Nas having some local ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers?

You dont think city or chelsea dont have top lawyers?

Well, that’s irrelevant. Thanks.

Online Olneythelonely

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8829
  • Location: Selly Park
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: FFP
« Reply #3775 on: January 07, 2025, 09:55:04 PM »
Better call Dave.

Better call olneytheloney

Heard he works alone

Your joke works better if you spell lonely correctly.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33780
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: FFP
« Reply #3776 on: January 08, 2025, 01:32:33 AM »
S'all good man!

I miss Jimmy.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33780
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: FFP
« Reply #3777 on: January 08, 2025, 01:34:06 AM »
I caught the end of  something on Talksport where they said Chelsea had sold their womens team to themselves, ehh ? how does that work ?
Sold it to their parent company. As long as they haven't inflated the price, which we're all waiting to see in the account when they're published, they can do that.

There'll have to be a PUP adjustment in there from memory of Group/Intercompanies accounting.

Offline edgysatsuma89

  • Member
  • Posts: 6581
Re: FFP
« Reply #3778 on: January 08, 2025, 02:13:20 AM »
Do you think Wes and Nas having some local ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers?

You dont think city or chelsea dont have top lawyers?

Well, that’s irrelevant. Thanks.

Something tells me this won't make him think twice. 🤔

Can you buy lawyers from the middle isle of Lidl? That's where Nas is mooching.

Online Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12191
Re: FFP
« Reply #3779 on: January 08, 2025, 08:35:37 AM »
Better call Dave.

Better call olneytheloney

Heard he works alone

Your joke works better if you spell lonely correctly.

You sound like a right cheerful chap 😂

Do you think Wes and Nas having some local ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers?

You dont think city or chelsea dont have top lawyers?

Well, that’s irrelevant. Thanks.

As was yours thanks
« Last Edit: January 08, 2025, 08:41:56 AM by Demitri_C »

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal