This is all over the back pages, seems odd because we don't get that level of media coverage but then it is International Week I suppose. It does strike me that this is a deliberate ploy by the club, in agreeing to the interview with the Athletic and it's amplification elsewhere, to shine a light on how ludicrous the situation we find ourselves in, is.Not that I can see it making any difference...
Quote from: Nev on September 04, 2024, 07:32:00 AMThis is all over the back pages, seems odd because we don't get that level of media coverage but then it is International Week I suppose. It does strike me that this is a deliberate ploy by the club, in agreeing to the interview with the Athletic and it's amplification elsewhere, to shine a light on how ludicrous the situation we find ourselves in, is.Not that I can see it making any difference...Ah, now I see why.
The infrastructure costs don't count. I've never seen anything about we can ignore the revenue loss of the work though but glad to be proven wrong. And how do you decide the loss? For example the NS now probably produces more revenue then it did last season.
I hope we have a climb down. Shave £20 quid off the season ticket prices and £40 off the non-ST.
Maybe that is part of the Heck masterplan. Get the revenue per seat up as high as possible then when we lose a stand the ‘allowable offset’ is a decent figure rather than based on the original numbers.
Apparently we've just been fined 60K by UEFA for submitting our financial information late.
Rinse a couple of thousand out of disabled fans, waste 60K with UEFA. Top work everyone.
If the financial year ends in June, would it be normal for a £200-300m company to have finalised its accounts by August?I guess it depends how much info they have to submit.