There is no doubt that relaxing the rules would allow Newcastle immediately the ability to outspend everyone. But that’s the huge mistake made by the PL. To allow essentially a sovereign state to own a team. Nobody can compete with that. The owners of Newcastle if allowed to spend as they wish cannot really make expensive mistakes in the market because their wealth would mask all of it.
Quote from: Somniloquism on September 04, 2024, 12:07:09 PMSomething in that message as well that apparently out of Kamara, Buendia, Mings and Ramsey, three of them are are on the highest wages. I can understand Kamara as he was a freebie and so we could pay more as no purchase fee, but surprised a player from Norwich and one from Bournemouth are up there. Of course they might be more middling but were being shown that they still cost against FFP/PSR even when not playing. TBH, I'm surprised there isn't an injury ruling to some extent. Well, Buendia was our record signing at the time and had had interest from Arsenal. Mings might have come from Bournemouth but since then has had two contract extensions to reflect his true worth to the team.
Something in that message as well that apparently out of Kamara, Buendia, Mings and Ramsey, three of them are are on the highest wages. I can understand Kamara as he was a freebie and so we could pay more as no purchase fee, but surprised a player from Norwich and one from Bournemouth are up there. Of course they might be more middling but were being shown that they still cost against FFP/PSR even when not playing. TBH, I'm surprised there isn't an injury ruling to some extent.
Did anyone catch the discussion on TS this morning.I caught the bit where it mentions Manure getting special concessions for Covid costs and Radcliffe investment costs.They also mentioned us and the guy/expert reckons we will have a £100m deficit to sort out by June next year. So far we’ve found £25m from player tradingI assume this does not take account of CL money, increased gate receipts and the new adidas deal.
Quote from: Dogtanian on September 04, 2024, 11:39:01 AMQuote from: Gareth on September 04, 2024, 11:38:02 AMHaving said all that if we do move eventually and having seen the signing off of a tunnel that looks like a 70’s brothel please don’t put him in charge of any design decisions :-)..unless of course we open a brothels?Should definitely increase revenues.
Quote from: Gareth on September 04, 2024, 11:38:02 AMHaving said all that if we do move eventually and having seen the signing off of a tunnel that looks like a 70’s brothel please don’t put him in charge of any design decisions :-)..unless of course we open a brothels?
Having said all that if we do move eventually and having seen the signing off of a tunnel that looks like a 70’s brothel please don’t put him in charge of any design decisions :-)
Quote from: Somniloquism on September 04, 2024, 12:07:33 PMQuote from: Dogtanian on September 04, 2024, 11:39:01 AMQuote from: Gareth on September 04, 2024, 11:38:02 AMHaving said all that if we do move eventually and having seen the signing off of a tunnel that looks like a 70’s brothel please don’t put him in charge of any design decisions :-)..unless of course we open a brothels?Should definitely increase revenues. 'Per head' revenue can be looked at differently.
They will still sell the ground out. There will be plenty of people who aren’t even Villa supporters who would fork out that sort of money to see a decent PL side play Bayern and Juventus. I think that’s what is pissing me off the most. Yeah, screw a decent amount of money out of the ST holders but then, the extra tickets, let’s not make it accessible for the match by match attenders, let’s just go for anyone willing to stump up that amount. It’s a proper kick in the bollocks. It won’t even generate that much extra cash in the bigger picture.
Even worse made by the fact that away support only gets charged £50,