FFP

[Hookeysmith]

I made a schoolboy error and i fully apologise

I am a twat

[Drummond]

https://x.com/acmilandata/status/1814260894550933894

Interesting that our rate of growth is 3rd largest in Europe in brand value % terms.

AC Milan - 162%, Bayer Leverkusen - 94% and then us on 70%. Next is Newcastle  on 61%

[rob_bridge]

https://x.com/acmilandata/status/1814260894550933894

Interesting that our rate of growth is 3rd largest in Europe in brand value % terms.

AC Milan - 162%, Bayer Leverkusen - 94% and then us on 70%. Next is Newcastle  on 61%

Suppose Gerard being hired bumped our profile if nothing else.

I think Martinez brilliance and Antics, hiring Emery, the Europa Conference league run and Champions League qualification and add in Ollie in Euros means highest profile for a long time

[Percy McCarthy]

https://x.com/acmilandata/status/1814260894550933894

Interesting that our rate of growth is 3rd largest in Europe in brand value % terms.

AC Milan - 162%, Bayer Leverkusen - 94% and then us on 70%. Next is Newcastle  on 61%

Suppose Gerard being hired bumped our profile if nothing else.

I think Martinez brilliance and Antics, hiring Emery, the Europa Conference league run and Champions League qualification and add in Ollie in Euros means highest profile for a long time

Yes, and I doubt the Euros and Copa America boosts are included yet. Then we’ve got the actual CL campaign, Adidas and 150th anniversary for further exposure.

[Tuscans]

https://x.com/acmilandata/status/1814260894550933894

Interesting that our rate of growth is 3rd largest in Europe in brand value % terms.

AC Milan - 162%, Bayer Leverkusen - 94% and then us on 70%. Next is Newcastle  on 61%

[pablo_picasso]

I missed this & just put it in the Chris Heck thread... 👍

[Dave P]

Presumably Tom Brady FC are 6th?

[edgysatsuma89]

https://x.com/acmilandata/status/1814260894550933894

Interesting that our rate of growth is 3rd largest in Europe in brand value % terms.

AC Milan - 162%, Bayer Leverkusen - 94% and then us on 70%. Next is Newcastle  on 61%

I no jack shit about AC Milan, why are they that far ahead of everyone else?

[Tuscans]

https://x.com/acmilandata/status/1814260894550933894

Interesting that our rate of growth is 3rd largest in Europe in brand value % terms.

AC Milan - 162%, Bayer Leverkusen - 94% and then us on 70%. Next is Newcastle  on 61%

I no jack shit about AC Milan, why are they that far ahead of everyone else?

https://brandfinance.com/insights/ac-milan-brand-identity-at-the-centre-of-growth

A major semi can attract a lot of people.

[paul_e]

This is why I like the idea of a proper intent signing this summer. Build on this brand growth with a Felix/Williams/etc type signing that looks too big for us.

I love the business we've done so far bringing in young quality players that can become world class with us but if we want to fast forward we need a name as well.

[pablo_picasso]

They were talking about this on Sky Sports News yesterday & how Inter Miami have grown purely thanks to signing Messi.

I wouldn't want us signing an old as fuck superstar just for his name, but we did sign someone like Williams, we really could take advantage of the PR from a signing like that.

I still don't know why we didn't utilise Alisha Lehmanns profile to our advantage. Don't get me wrong, shes an average footballer, but her social media reach is ridiculous for such an average player.

I think we missed a trick there with her profile reach.m

[OCD]

If we hadn't made those trades at the end of June we would have been in breach of PSR and faced a points deduction. Another month and we could potentially make a PSR profit of £50m from selling 2 players, and because of amortisation could spend £250m and be compliant. Just shows how daft the current system is.

[Tuscans]

If we hadn't made those trades at the end of June we would have been in breach of PSR and faced a points deduction. Another month and we could potentially make a PSR profit of £50m from selling 2 players, and because of amortisation could spend £250m and be compliant. Just shows how daft the current system is.

I understand why there's that c@nty group of clubs who don't want change because the revenues they generate are so high but why others didn't get on board of the small increase Heck/NSWE suggested in losses is surprising.

[OCD]

i think it was just short-termism combined with it changing in a year's time...'we're ok and we know you and some of others are struggling so we're not going to vote that through'.

[London Villan]

The sale of Duran, Luiz and Diaby - along with our increased turnover will give us massive potential to spend over the coming years.