Quote from: Percy McCarthy on June 08, 2024, 05:32:23 AMQuote from: PaulWinch again on June 08, 2024, 03:00:50 AMSome article in “footballer insider” stating we need to raise £60m from player sales to avoid being in breach. That seems pretty high to me, but I hope it’s not the case.I can’t see it being that much. Based on our request for the allowable losses being upped by £30m, that could be the figure. If it’s more than that we might have been working on the principles that a £60m increase was even less likely to be voted through, and every little helps.And on top of all that, I’m not sure how Football Insider would know.Yes hopefully it’s inaccurate- if it is though that’s a pretty poor place to have gotten ourselves into.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on June 08, 2024, 03:00:50 AMSome article in “footballer insider” stating we need to raise £60m from player sales to avoid being in breach. That seems pretty high to me, but I hope it’s not the case.I can’t see it being that much. Based on our request for the allowable losses being upped by £30m, that could be the figure. If it’s more than that we might have been working on the principles that a £60m increase was even less likely to be voted through, and every little helps.And on top of all that, I’m not sure how Football Insider would know.
Some article in “footballer insider” stating we need to raise £60m from player sales to avoid being in breach. That seems pretty high to me, but I hope it’s not the case.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on June 08, 2024, 09:14:37 AMQuote from: Percy McCarthy on June 08, 2024, 05:32:23 AMQuote from: PaulWinch again on June 08, 2024, 03:00:50 AMSome article in “footballer insider” stating we need to raise £60m from player sales to avoid being in breach. That seems pretty high to me, but I hope it’s not the case.I can’t see it being that much. Based on our request for the allowable losses being upped by £30m, that could be the figure. If it’s more than that we might have been working on the principles that a £60m increase was even less likely to be voted through, and every little helps.And on top of all that, I’m not sure how Football Insider would know.Yes hopefully it’s inaccurate- if it is though that’s a pretty poor place to have gotten ourselves into.It's Football Insider, accuracy isn't exactly their forte.
Quote from: Steve67 on June 08, 2024, 12:52:33 AMAdidas Villa Park has a ring to it.Had anyone suggesting asking Wes Edens about getting Fortress Investment Group to sponsor the stadium. We could call it ....
Adidas Villa Park has a ring to it.
Sky deleted the articles according to some northern newspaper. I linked it earlier in the thread.I think they looked at an article by Football Insider, or the like, & got a bit excited. They even hyped up a "mini transfer window" on Sky Sports News...
I note with interest that Newcastle have bid £15m for that young Burnley keeper, Trafford is it? Seems that’s two clubs (Chelsea is the other one) that can be crossed off Sky’s list of skint pricks that HAVE TO SELL PLAYERS BEFORE THE END OF JUNE!!!
And that Scottish twat...
Quote from: pablo_picasso on June 08, 2024, 04:16:09 PMAnd that Scottish twat...Gordon Brown?