Quote from: villadelph on June 07, 2024, 04:34:23 PMQuote from: Ads on June 07, 2024, 03:11:34 PMThat's because they've sold the hotel to their parent group. We can sell BMH, next season the Academy etc. What a system.This needs to be addressed and changed.. the system is so bent. Quote@David_Ornstein Chelsea avoided breaching the PSR limit by selling the two hotels and car parks at Stamford Bridge to a sister company for £76.5 million. This was enough to turn a £166.4 million loss in 2022-23 into a £89.9 million deficit for the club. #CFC It’s just fucking wrong. Blatantly wrong. And the PL don’t step in and do anything about it. And that includes the clubs. Do they not call this out?
Quote from: Ads on June 07, 2024, 03:11:34 PMThat's because they've sold the hotel to their parent group. We can sell BMH, next season the Academy etc. What a system.This needs to be addressed and changed.. the system is so bent. Quote@David_Ornstein Chelsea avoided breaching the PSR limit by selling the two hotels and car parks at Stamford Bridge to a sister company for £76.5 million. This was enough to turn a £166.4 million loss in 2022-23 into a £89.9 million deficit for the club. #CFC
That's because they've sold the hotel to their parent group. We can sell BMH, next season the Academy etc. What a system.
@David_Ornstein Chelsea avoided breaching the PSR limit by selling the two hotels and car parks at Stamford Bridge to a sister company for £76.5 million. This was enough to turn a £166.4 million loss in 2022-23 into a £89.9 million deficit for the club. #CFC
Is what Chelsea are doing with hotels really any different to us selling VP to ourselves?
Quote from: Ads on June 07, 2024, 03:11:34 PMThat's because they've sold the hotel to their parent group. We can sell BMH, next season the Academy etc. What a system.I read that fell into last year's accounts and is still under investigation as to whether it's allowable.
As disclosed in the Directors' Report, during the year the group commenced a review and restructure of its real estate portfolio resulting in the sale of hotel buildings and car park property to Blueco 22 Properties Limited, a fellow subsidiary of the intermediate parent company, Blueco 22 Limited. In ascertaining the transaction price included within these financial statements, the Directors have obtained market values from two industry leading property valuers, for the purposes of recognising a gain of £76.3m in these financial statements. The Directors agree that these valuations reflect the best estimate when determining the market value of the hotel buildings and car park property.The consideration for the transaction is subject to Premier League assessment under their associated party transactions rules, as at the date of signing the financial statements, this process is still to be concluded therefore there is a possibility that the Premier League determination of a fair market value, may differ from that recognised within these financial statements. The Directors note that the conclusion of this process may result in a material change to the gain recognised in these financial statements.
Quote from: Ads on June 07, 2024, 03:11:34 PMThat's because they've sold the hotel to their parent group. We can sell BMH, next season the Academy etc. What a system.Great. I wonder if it's worth taking the points deduction rather than sell a player integral to the team. As I understand it, Villa would have zero debt if the owners left tomorrow, albeit without the club owning VP, so what exactly are we going to be punished for?I'm also getting fed up with Liverpool fans online getting all sanctimonious about the need to be sustainable and how they did it under Klopp blah blah as if their global fanbase which sustains their current spending wasn't established by spending shitloads of money in the 70's and the 80's.
A Villa Park naming rights deal on June 30th is the inevitable outcome here surely.