collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Posts

Re: Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:24:38 AM]


Re: FFP by paul_e
[Today at 01:16:01 AM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by Skipper_The_Eyechild
[Today at 12:48:47 AM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by olaftab
[Today at 12:47:07 AM]


Re: Back in the old routine - Newcastle at home by dave.woodhall
[Today at 12:41:27 AM]


Re: Where will Villa finish 2025/26 by olaftab
[Today at 12:41:21 AM]


Re: FFP by Toronto Villa
[Today at 12:40:50 AM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by Skipper_The_Eyechild
[Today at 12:38:35 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Champions League restructuring  (Read 154007 times)

Offline Ad@m

  • Member
  • Posts: 12563
  • GM : 23.03.2023
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #915 on: April 20, 2021, 09:12:16 AM »
None of the players will quit unless and until it looks like they won't be allowed to compete in the Premier League or for their national teams.

They'll just sit it out and see what happens - they'd be mental to do anything else. In isolation, a player has zero weight in this discussion. They only have power if the PFA lead it.

Offline sickbeggar

  • Member
  • Posts: 7781
  • Location: Universities are full of people educated beyond their intelligence
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #916 on: April 20, 2021, 09:16:09 AM »
I would be amazed if any footballer at one of the ESL clubs decided they did not want to play for that team anymore - not one will give up £100k + a week (not a chance, and I don't blame them)

Darren Bent was asked the same question this morning, he said he would stay at the club.


Depends who you are I think. The top players tend to want to progress their careers and the money comes along with that naturally. If Grealish wanted to join madrid/City/whoever before all this, you'd realise he was getting a nice payrise but you couldn't argue with the logic he'd probably be more likely to win trophies or become a regular for England.  Now he's probably got a bigger chance of starting for England with us with half the rest of the squad ineligible,

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33168
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #917 on: April 20, 2021, 09:18:22 AM »
He's also said that they should consider shorter matches as "that's what young fans want". He's an absolute bellend.


I can also see them having a no draws policy or sudden death OT like in American Rugby / Rounders / Netball so they there is always winners.

Offline artvandelay

  • Member
  • Posts: 218
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #918 on: April 20, 2021, 09:18:40 AM »
I am instinctively pro these six being kicked out of the Premier League. However, they're unlikely to just no longer play domestic football, and have no doubt thought through this scenario.

The next move from their position is surely to set up their own domestic league based on the six clubs, probably trying to pad the numbers with the Old Firm, and/or trying to bribe a couple of the PL sides with the most instagram followers to join a closed no relegation league, with the chance to be one of the invited clubs to their super duper league. With 10ish clubs they could have more and more 'big' games, control the fixture list to avoid clashes with their european league, and play domestic games abroad. They'll also be able to cut up the TV rights as they want.

The gamble they're taking is that consumers (sadly not supporters) have an appetite for this ahead of the Premier League/Champions League product.

As an aside, does this make Champions League qualification for us a very real possibility this season? As absurd as that is...

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29206
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #919 on: April 20, 2021, 09:18:49 AM »
Jack is an odd case though, he's emotionally driven and I don't doubt that he'd be utterly torn about losing an international career for a Super League contract.

Offline Clive W

  • Member
  • Posts: 399
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #920 on: April 20, 2021, 09:19:22 AM »
Apparently UEFA negotiating a £5.2b deal with Centricus Asset Management, a London based hedge fund

Currently UEFA doles out £3b each year

So I think I see where this is heading

UEFA does the deal based on the new “improved” CL format that was agreed yesterday. The “dirty dozen” were happy with the format but not the allocation of dosh.

So, UEFA agrees that the extra £2.2b should go mainly to the 12 to pretty much compensate for the money they would have got from JP Morgan (which was only as upfront loan anyway)

The 12 “reluctantly” agree to step back into the fold, claiming that their action was only intended for the good of the game at grass roots level

We all move on....nothing to see here


Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33168
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #921 on: April 20, 2021, 09:20:44 AM »
I would be amazed if any footballer at one of the ESL clubs decided they did not want to play for that team anymore - not one will give up £100k + a week (not a chance, and I don't blame them)

Darren Bent was asked the same question this morning, he said he would stay at the club.


Depends who you are I think. The top players tend to want to progress their careers and the money comes along with that naturally. If Grealish wanted to join madrid/City/whoever before all this, you'd realise he was getting a nice payrise but you couldn't argue with the logic he'd probably be more likely to win trophies or become a regular for England.  Now he's probably got a bigger chance of starting for England with us with half the rest of the squad ineligible,

I suppose it will depend on how much they want to represent their national team and whether a million a week will alleviate that pain of not doing that.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33168
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #922 on: April 20, 2021, 09:26:06 AM »
Has Beijing Red reappeared on Twitter to add his comments. The trouble is like Trump and Johnson, it is hard to parody when real life is even more of a parody.

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29206
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #923 on: April 20, 2021, 09:26:38 AM »
Oliver Holt said last night that two of the English clubs are wavering, and I'd bet anything you like that it's Chelsea and Man City. IF it's true.

Offline Clive W

  • Member
  • Posts: 399
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #924 on: April 20, 2021, 09:30:22 AM »
Oliver Holt said last night that two of the English clubs are wavering, and I'd bet anything you like that it's Chelsea and Man City. IF it's true.

They were “reluctant” applicants (allegedly)

According to Perez at RM, all 12 have signed binding contracts so I’m not sure what the penalties would be for a club pulling out

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72707
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #925 on: April 20, 2021, 09:30:45 AM »
Chelsea and Man City were, apparently, least convinced of the merits of the proposal and acquiesced due to fears of being left behind. Hopefully one or both break ranks and the whole thing crumbles.

Offline sickbeggar

  • Member
  • Posts: 7781
  • Location: Universities are full of people educated beyond their intelligence
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #926 on: April 20, 2021, 09:31:28 AM »
yeah i don't honestly think the likes of Mount, Kane, Rashford etc...…...see International football as a chore. I think they genuinely want to represent England because well they were kids once and that's what you dream of. If it came down to them being out in the International cold for any length of time, I really think they would give the situation some very hard thought but again you need the big 6 to let you leave, and UEFA to allow transfers between the two leagues otherwise you're stuck in limbo for the length of your contract.

Offline Villan82

  • Member
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #927 on: April 20, 2021, 09:31:56 AM »
Even if this does not go ahead, there needs to be consequences for those who pulled this stunt.

And their inclusion of Spurs, a club who have won SFA in their history, was the ultimate insult to illustrious clubs all over Europe.

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29206
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #928 on: April 20, 2021, 09:32:07 AM »
Oliver Holt said last night that two of the English clubs are wavering, and I'd bet anything you like that it's Chelsea and Man City. IF it's true.

They were “reluctant” applicants (allegedly)

According to Perez at RM, all 12 have signed binding contracts so I’m not sure what the penalties would be for a club pulling out

I think he's lying. Every report I've seen, in The Athletic and elsewhere, makes clear there is no binding contract, and I trust that more than I trust Perez - frankly, I trust an alligator with its jaws around my head more than I trust Perez.

Offline Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47589
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: Champions League restructuring
« Reply #929 on: April 20, 2021, 09:34:43 AM »
Oliver Holt said last night that two of the English clubs are wavering, and I'd bet anything you like that it's Chelsea and Man City. IF it's true.

Couldn't be anyone else. If you're only involved in the sport to provide yourself with a veneer of international respectability and you don't care about the money, why would you invite any more controversy than you needed to.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal