And classless twats sack Jose.
Aston Villa chief executive Christian Purslow says the proposed Super League is a "grotesque concept". Speaking to BBC Radio Four, he said: "These proposals do away with sporting merit. It would enable a small number of clubs to be in this competition come what may and, for millions of people in football, that goes against everything the sport means and stands for."The idea is that the uncertainty that comes with sport, that makes it so compelling, that we all love, is actually damaging to the business model of these huge clubs."So the scheme is designed to take away that uncertainty, to give predictability to their businesses so that, if they're badly managed or have a poor year, they're still in the premier tournament. Does that sound like sport or football to you? To me it sounds a grotesque concept."
Quote from: olaftab on April 19, 2021, 10:26:29 AMAnd classless twats sack Jose.Very harsh. He got Spurs into the Super League in his first full season.
Quote from: sickbeggar on April 19, 2021, 10:13:28 AMQuote from: Risso on April 19, 2021, 10:05:12 AMQuote from: sickbeggar on April 19, 2021, 10:00:54 AMI wouldn't kick them out. Serious. It's going to effect the money we get off SKY and weaken us. Let them stay in, suffer having to play all the extra games, lose the CL money with maybe us gaining it. To break cover like this, they must have the financial backing of major players so its going to happen. Why not benefit from it?Because it's the thin end of the wedge. The end goal is clearly an NFL style 24 or 32 team Super League, with franchises in the major European [footballing] cities, and then in time in places like Qatar. It'll be a completey closed shop, and then we'll just be left with completely devalued national leagues.Well was that not the gameplan anyway? They've certainly been edging towards that scenario as it is. All this is grabbing a bigger slice of the cake that we wouldn't have been asked to taste anyway. I'd be very surprised if SKY didn't know all about this anyway because you don't piss off your major revenue supplier and just announce it to them. Bottom line is there will be less money and less exposure for us if we chuck them out the PL. This way, at least the foreign fans will still pay to watch ManU in the PL.I'm not sure if you've missed what I'm getting at. They'll only be in the Premier League for the time it takes them to get the fully fledged Super League up and running, then they'll leave and just play in that. We'll then be left with the Premier League with us and Everton as the biggest teams left and the likes of Sheffield United and Norwich making up the 6 who have left, and with the best will in the world, nobody's going to pay good money for that.
Quote from: Risso on April 19, 2021, 10:05:12 AMQuote from: sickbeggar on April 19, 2021, 10:00:54 AMI wouldn't kick them out. Serious. It's going to effect the money we get off SKY and weaken us. Let them stay in, suffer having to play all the extra games, lose the CL money with maybe us gaining it. To break cover like this, they must have the financial backing of major players so its going to happen. Why not benefit from it?Because it's the thin end of the wedge. The end goal is clearly an NFL style 24 or 32 team Super League, with franchises in the major European [footballing] cities, and then in time in places like Qatar. It'll be a completey closed shop, and then we'll just be left with completely devalued national leagues.Well was that not the gameplan anyway? They've certainly been edging towards that scenario as it is. All this is grabbing a bigger slice of the cake that we wouldn't have been asked to taste anyway. I'd be very surprised if SKY didn't know all about this anyway because you don't piss off your major revenue supplier and just announce it to them. Bottom line is there will be less money and less exposure for us if we chuck them out the PL. This way, at least the foreign fans will still pay to watch ManU in the PL.
Quote from: sickbeggar on April 19, 2021, 10:00:54 AMI wouldn't kick them out. Serious. It's going to effect the money we get off SKY and weaken us. Let them stay in, suffer having to play all the extra games, lose the CL money with maybe us gaining it. To break cover like this, they must have the financial backing of major players so its going to happen. Why not benefit from it?Because it's the thin end of the wedge. The end goal is clearly an NFL style 24 or 32 team Super League, with franchises in the major European [footballing] cities, and then in time in places like Qatar. It'll be a completey closed shop, and then we'll just be left with completely devalued national leagues.
I wouldn't kick them out. Serious. It's going to effect the money we get off SKY and weaken us. Let them stay in, suffer having to play all the extra games, lose the CL money with maybe us gaining it. To break cover like this, they must have the financial backing of major players so its going to happen. Why not benefit from it?
Quote from: olaftab on April 19, 2021, 10:26:29 AMAnd classless twats sack Jose.Seems more than a coincidence that it's today - wonder if he kicked off at Levy about the whole thing? I can't imagine Pep is impressed either as it devalues their CL semi-final and he doesn't like to talking to the press at the best of time.
Quote from: Dave on April 19, 2021, 10:30:40 AMQuote from: olaftab on April 19, 2021, 10:26:29 AMAnd classless twats sack Jose.Very harsh. He got Spurs into the Super League in his first full season. Ace !
The Premier League are in a bit of a bind. They have signed TV deals a commercial arrangements with sponsors that assumes a 20-teamstable league and - implicit - the presence of the so-called Giants. It will find the money drops off quickly, so its ability to wave a big stick at the scabs is somewhat limited.,
Well we're a bit more robust than a lot of leagues I think, so if that happened I wouldn't be that worried. Certainly more than 15 clubs capable of 40000 plus attendances in the pyramid. I think people would still come through the turnstiles to watch it. I have no wish to watch Liverpool play Man U 4 times per season with no relegation/promotion although I can imagine that would appeal to overseas viewers but it sounds no better than the CL to me. They seem to be talking about some sort of promotion relegation anyway because well if you don't you get stagnation.. Anyway if you let them stay, you have them over a barrel. The PL wouldn't sign an agreement where they could fuck off in 5 years because there's nothing in it for them.
Depends on the finances of these breakaway clubs. I imagine the likes of Chelsea and City are okay, but Arsenal, Man U, Tottenham etc.. Over in Spain, rumours Barca are not in good shape... Probably Italy as well. Can they afford to lose their place at the trough while they set this league up? The PL will take a big financial hit if they left straight away, but they'd survive.
Quote on the BBC from Christian Purslow.QuoteAston Villa chief executive Christian Purslow says the proposed Super League is a "grotesque concept". Speaking to BBC Radio Four, he said: "These proposals do away with sporting merit. It would enable a small number of clubs to be in this competition come what may and, for millions of people in football, that goes against everything the sport means and stands for."The idea is that the uncertainty that comes with sport, that makes it so compelling, that we all love, is actually damaging to the business model of these huge clubs."So the scheme is designed to take away that uncertainty, to give predictability to their businesses so that, if they're badly managed or have a poor year, they're still in the premier tournament. Does that sound like sport or football to you? To me it sounds a grotesque concept."Well said Christian.