collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Champions League Contention by SaddVillan
[Today at 12:44:12 AM]


Other Games - 2023/24 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 12:42:47 AM]


Villa - Arsenal 89-90 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 12:41:33 AM]


Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by Ads
[April 28, 2024, 11:47:33 PM]


Douglas Luiz - Confirmed confirmed by PaulWinch again
[April 28, 2024, 11:19:47 PM]


Moussa Diaby - Confirmed by Axl Rose
[April 28, 2024, 11:15:52 PM]


Loanwatch 2023/24 by AV84
[April 28, 2024, 11:09:51 PM]


MOTD by PeterWithe
[April 28, 2024, 11:07:30 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Champions League Contention by SaddVillan
[Today at 12:44:12 AM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 12:42:47 AM]


Re: Villa - Arsenal 89-90 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 12:41:33 AM]


Re: Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by Ads
[April 28, 2024, 11:47:33 PM]


Re: Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by Skerra
[April 28, 2024, 11:28:45 PM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by David_Nab
[April 28, 2024, 11:20:28 PM]


Re: Douglas Luiz - Confirmed confirmed by PaulWinch again
[April 28, 2024, 11:19:47 PM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by Toronto Villa
[April 28, 2024, 11:16:07 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Premier League reform proposals  (Read 34747 times)

Offline Behind Bluenose Lines

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2409
  • Location: Hanging on in Quiet Desperation During a Global Pandemic
  • GM : 28.06.2024
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #135 on: October 12, 2020, 10:46:25 AM »
Simon Jordan on Talksport tearing Rick Parry a new one at the moment!  :D

Offline Big Ming

  • Member
  • Posts: 574
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #136 on: October 12, 2020, 10:54:25 AM »
Not at all surprised if 'Agent' Parry was not inserted into the EFL job with just this in mind.

Offline LukeJames

  • Member
  • Posts: 5172
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #137 on: October 12, 2020, 11:12:44 AM »
The 'big 6' get to decide who owns the other clubs.

Fucking hell 😂😂

And these proposals come out a week after Man Utd and Liverpool get annihilated.

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #138 on: October 12, 2020, 11:21:18 AM »
what am I missing - we have had more seasons in the  PL than Southampton surely?

Offline Yeltzer

  • Member
  • Posts: 3498
  • Location: Stourbridge
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #139 on: October 12, 2020, 11:22:03 AM »
what am I missing - we have had more seasons in the  PL than Southampton surely?

I think they mean longest serving since last promoted to the league

Offline wolfman999

  • Member
  • Posts: 923
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #140 on: October 12, 2020, 11:41:41 AM »
what am I missing - we have had more seasons in the  PL than Southampton surely?

They rigged it by saying continuous members of the Premier league otherwise we and I believe others actually have more years of membership than Citeh and that would never do.

Offline danno

  • Member
  • Posts: 3055
  • Location: Super Tamworth
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #141 on: October 12, 2020, 11:51:07 AM »
I don't get why we're so hung up on not being part of the three stooges (patsies) to the "big six".
Are we saying we'd be in favour of this power grab if they deemed us one of the bigger boys too?

This whole exercise is precisely because we're standing up to the bigger kids, and about to get back our lunch money.

Offline robleflaneur

  • Member
  • Posts: 812
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #142 on: October 12, 2020, 11:54:06 AM »
Who gets special status outside the top 6 is meaningless ,though Leicester who won the league recently and finished 5th have the strongest case.
David Conn in the Guardian points out that reducing the Prem by 2 clubs and a bigger TV share for the EFL will reduce the revenue for most PL clubs but the Champions League format will be extended and the revenues for the top clubs will increase.
The consequence will be that the gap between the top 4/6 and the rest will increase.

Offline AllanW

  • Member
  • Posts: 208
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #143 on: October 12, 2020, 12:10:28 PM »
Who gets special status outside the top 6 is meaningless ,though Leicester who won the league recently and finished 5th have the strongest case.
David Conn in the Guardian points out that reducing the Prem by 2 clubs and a bigger TV share for the EFL will reduce the revenue for most PL clubs but the Champions League format will be extended and the revenues for the top clubs will increase.
The consequence will be that the gap between the top 4/6 and the rest will increase.
Precisely. That's the only point the Big 6 are playing for; all the rest of their 'case' is meaningless guff.

What is the current state of the European Premier league discussions, please? Is this latest set of bollocks  being pushed in England now because they still can't work out the distribution of spoils for the ESL? At least 4 of the Big 6 would immediately go into that league leaving the rest of us to continue to fight for a national league title. My reading of it a few years ago was that if the ESL were created the financial stability of the remaining Premier and EFL teams would be better because the wage pressure would not be so great and a fairer distribution of tv money could be agreed without the monstrous 4 or 6 being involved.

Offline p_ad

  • Member
  • Posts: 439
  • Location: Scotland
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #144 on: October 12, 2020, 12:32:57 PM »
Spurs really ! That really is all you need to know how shite this idea is

Offline exigo

  • Member
  • Posts: 2782
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #145 on: October 12, 2020, 12:35:34 PM »
So Man U, sick of getting dicked every week in the Premier League, seem to be playing a hand that will see them joining a European league where they will get dicked even more.

Offline malckennedy

  • Member
  • Posts: 855
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #146 on: October 12, 2020, 12:46:49 PM »
What are the chances of them getting their way on this? I know we shouldn’t be complacent but surely their chances are remote because at least 11 and probably 14 of the clubs who are disadvantaged by it will not support it?

Offline Havencheese

  • Member
  • Posts: 847
  • Location: Melbourne
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #147 on: October 12, 2020, 12:52:57 PM »
If I wasn’t so outraged, I would think of this as utterly hilarious, sure it’s intimidating but ultimately it’s just so desperate and flimsy. Like making jam from pig shit and bottling it for a premium. You can bet there will be further suggestions but these wankers drinking their own bathwater must be so drunk off their hubris to think this will fly and that the rest of the world will just lie down and won’t see it for what it really is.

Some of these snakes in suits are just exposing themselves as the sociopaths they really are. Is it a bit rich for me to suggest that Parry be stripped to his underwear, tarred and feathered, placed in a cannon and fired into the sun?

Offline AllanW

  • Member
  • Posts: 208
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #148 on: October 12, 2020, 12:53:50 PM »
What are the chances of them getting their way on this? I know we shouldn’t be complacent but surely their chances are remote because at least 11 and probably 14 of the clubs who are disadvantaged by it will not support it?

You'd have thought so, wouldn't you?

I can't see Wes and Nassef being thrilled about not being included ...

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 85530
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #149 on: October 12, 2020, 12:56:09 PM »
What are the chances of them getting their way on this? I know we shouldn’t be complacent but surely their chances are remote because at least 11 and probably 14 of the clubs who are disadvantaged by it will not support it?

I imagine they'll have made their support for any financial assistance package to the EFL contingent on support for this in return, so that if small clubs start going bust, they can say that they wanted to help but their kind offers of assistance were rejected.  If was Edens and Sawiris I'd be starting to get the other clubs not mentioned as being part of the new brigade on side.  Our owners have got to be the richest outside of the 'Big 6' haven't they?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal