These deals may will be of more monetary value than those before them but I believe the name of Aston Villa deserves better and sadly I don't believe our commercial department understand this and have therefore repeatedly undersold us.
If you don't think we deserve better and you're content with our commercial departments performance I guess there's little I can say to change you minds. I just think the name of Aston Villa has missed a massive opportunity to exploit the global success of the league that we created by the poor performance of un creative commercial team.The contentment among these ranks reaks of the same apathy that allowed Alex Mcleish through the door.
Quote from: Lucky Eddie on May 20, 2014, 02:29:28 PMIf you don't think we deserve better and you're content with our commercial departments performance I guess there's little I can say to change you minds. I just think the name of Aston Villa has missed a massive opportunity to exploit the global success of the league that we created by the poor performance of un creative commercial team.The contentment among these ranks reaks of the same apathy that allowed Alex Mcleish through the door. You avoided the points me and Dave made. If it was just about money (as I presume you are suggesting) we wouldn't have given Acorns the chance to get themselves recognised and taken the best financial offer we could.
Ten years ago we had a commercial department and a football ground to rival the best in the country; the very idea that Wigan, Hull and Swansea would be mentioned commercially in the same breath as Aston Villa was unthinkable!
So who out there sees Aston Villa as a major name that they want to be associated with? Even FX Pro - or whatever - dumped us for Fulham.
Quote from: peter w on May 20, 2014, 02:31:35 PMSo who out there sees Aston Villa as a major name that they want to be associated with? Even FX Pro - or whatever - dumped us for Fulham.Was that because their ground is on Heathrow flight path? Or was that Brentford?