collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Somniloquism
[Today at 01:43:07 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by algy
[Today at 01:36:49 PM]


Kits 25/26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 01:26:17 PM]


Domestic and European Rugby Union by tomd2103
[Today at 01:20:48 PM]


Leon Bailey (out on loan to AS Roma) by PeterWithe
[Today at 01:14:08 PM]


Unai Emery by Olneythelonely
[Today at 01:06:54 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 12:25:18 PM]


Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by Villa Lew
[Today at 11:41:49 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: MOTD  (Read 353297 times)

Offline Jon Crofts

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21779
  • Location: Lost In The Supermarket
  • GM : PCM
Re: MOTD
« Reply #435 on: March 13, 2023, 03:15:12 PM »
Is he still outside IR35? How the chuff does he manage that?

HMRC have felt his collar on it, and it's just awaiting the tribunal. My considered opinion is that he's got absolutely no chance.

He owes about £5 million doesn't he? Good. I haven't had a sniff at an outside IR35 piece of work in ages, pretty much every contract consultant I talk to says there's absolutely nowt doing unless it's via an umbrella inside 35.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33261
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #436 on: March 13, 2023, 03:18:23 PM »
Looks like he will be coming back.
Missed opportunity to change the guard.

I agree on everyone else's take that MotD is old and needs a shake-up. However the BBC weren't removing him for this, they had suddenly decided to remove him for daring to criticise a policy many know is unworkable. There was nothing controversial or offensive* in those tweets to make the BBC decide this was the action needed. In fact justifying it on impartiality reasons a few weeks after the Chairs controversial appointment make is look even more like censorship. I was actually more offended with his tweet when Emery was appointed. And don't forget it wasn't just the old guard, lots of presenters new and old took it as massive overreaction and unfair. Unless they went down the route of no presenters, I think most would look at taking that job as a poisoned chalice.

So no, I don't think it was a missed opportunity to change the guard on the back of that. The missed opportunity was when they decided to renew his contract in 2020.

* apart from history buffs.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #437 on: March 13, 2023, 03:25:06 PM »
Is he still outside IR35? How the chuff does he manage that?

HMRC have felt his collar on it, and it's just awaiting the tribunal. My considered opinion is that he's got absolutely no chance.

He owes about £5 million doesn't he? Good. I haven't had a sniff at an outside IR35 piece of work in ages, pretty much every contract consultant I talk to says there's absolutely nowt doing unless it's via an umbrella inside 35.

A lot of employers take a zero tolerance approach these days, and just say it's PAYE or nothing.

Online lovejoy

  • Member
  • Posts: 9546
  • Location: Haywards Heath
Re: MOTD
« Reply #438 on: March 13, 2023, 03:54:59 PM »
The government are relaxing the IR35 reforms aren't they - not sure this is sending out the right message personally.
Either way the tax affairs of a football presenter are small beer in comparison to inhumane treatment of desperate people and ugly rhetoric around our response to them.

Offline SaddVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2365
  • Location: Saddleworth
  • 1000 ft up in the hills gazing down on Manchester
Re: MOTD
« Reply #439 on: March 13, 2023, 04:45:08 PM »
Looks like he will be coming back.
Missed opportunity to change the guard.



I agree on everyone else's take that MotD is old and needs a shake-up. However the BBC weren't removing him for this, they had suddenly decided to remove him for daring to criticise a policy many know is unworkable. There was nothing controversial or offensive* in those tweets to make the BBC decide this was the action needed. In fact justifying it on impartiality reasons a few weeks after the Chairs controversial appointment make is look even more like censorship. I was actually more offended with his tweet when Emery was appointed. And don't forget it wasn't just the old guard, lots of presenters new and old took it as massive overreaction and unfair. Unless they went down the route of no presenters, I think most would look at taking that job as a poisoned chalice.

So no, I don't think it was a missed opportunity to change the guard on the back of that. The missed opportunity was when they decided to renew his contract in 2020.

* apart from history buffs.

Take your point on the format. It's tired, derivative and lazy.

It doesn't cover the Prem equally, the focus is only ever on the "Super Six" and then on which ever one is "in crisis", the rest of the are treated in a very patronising manner.

A major criticism is that it relies on the chumocracy of ex- professionals who by and large have difficulties with English grammar, struggle to explain themselves and duck out of criticising players.

They're happy to stage off referees,
never call out cheating or diving and they never call out shite performances.

Could/would the public tune in for something that's a bit less tabloid?

Get a referee on to explain how decisions are made.

Focus on a different club each week.

Get FSA representatives on to discuss issues of concern to supporters.

On the continent football programmes have panels that include top journalists who are able to provide a more detached analysis of the game - looking at the bigger picture, with proper criticism and analysis, and not just pointing out who kicked what where.

If one good thing comes out of this episode, it might be a major review of the MOTD format and concept.

And a final thought - good though Lineker may or may not be and setting aside the current controversy - how many viewers would the programme actually lose if he were replaced when his contract expires by say Mark Chapman?

Offline clash city rocker

  • Member
  • Posts: 3773
  • Location: Out in the sticks these days
Re: MOTD
« Reply #440 on: March 13, 2023, 05:01:26 PM »
How relevant is motd these days ? I never watch it. Not like years ago. Sky and the Internet changed all that. I see average viewing figures are about 2.1m...is that a lot in today's viewing figures?  For me  I might be more tempted to watch it if it had different pundits on every week. Maybe players and managers from lower leagues who might give viewers a different insight. Even non league pundits. There might be some right stars out there. Fuck this shearer/wright/murphy/ richards/ Lineker...week in week out....

Online Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23237
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: MOTD
« Reply #441 on: March 13, 2023, 05:03:56 PM »
Not sure about the workings of IR35 but wasn't it aimed at people who do 100% of their work for one company?  In GE's case he works predominantly for the BBC but also does some BT stuff, then there's the Crisps, modelling and other endorsements he's involved in. 

Online Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23237
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: MOTD
« Reply #442 on: March 13, 2023, 05:10:11 PM »
How relevant is motd these days ? I never watch it. Not like years ago. Sky and the Internet changed all that. I see average viewing figures are about 2.1m...is that a lot in today's viewing figures?  For me  I might be more tempted to watch it if it had different pundits on every week. Maybe players and managers from lower leagues who might give viewers a different insight. Even non league pundits. There might be some right stars out there. Fuck this shearer/wright/murphy/ richards/ Lineker...week in week out....

I'm the same in that it's not a must see most of the time.  Having said that, watching a match we're involved in down the pub live I look forward to the highlights on MOTD to get their analysis if we play well and win.  Shearer's limited adjectives to describe our good play give one a nice warm glow after a feed of beer.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #443 on: March 13, 2023, 05:10:43 PM »
Not sure about the workings of IR35 but wasn't it aimed at people who do 100% of their work for one company? 

No. Not at all.

Online Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23237
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: MOTD
« Reply #444 on: March 13, 2023, 05:16:10 PM »
Not sure about the workings of IR35 but wasn't it aimed at people who do 100% of their work for one company? 

No. Not at all.

Oh. In a sentence explain to the uninitiated (me) what it's about please, who is it meant to trap/control etc?

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #445 on: March 13, 2023, 05:23:04 PM »
Not sure about the workings of IR35 but wasn't it aimed at people who do 100% of their work for one company? 

No. Not at all.

Oh. In a sentence explain to the uninitiated (me) what it's about please, who is it meant to trap/control etc?

It's designed to stop people who should be employees of a company disguising themselves as self-employed and therefore paying less tax and national insurance. There's no one measure that means you are or aren't an employee, but HMRC and the courts look at a range of factors. As somebody involved in this area for a living and who has no love for HMRC whatsoever, I would politely suggest that Lineker is taking the piss.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74617
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #446 on: March 13, 2023, 06:02:21 PM »
Is he still outside IR35? How the chuff does he manage that?

HMRC have felt his collar on it, and it's just awaiting the tribunal. My considered opinion is that he's got absolutely no chance.

He owes about £5 million doesn't he? Good. I haven't had a sniff at an outside IR35 piece of work in ages, pretty much every contract consultant I talk to says there's absolutely nowt doing unless it's via an umbrella inside 35.

I've been looking at maybe doing some contracting some time, having not done any for a while now.

IR35 used to (years ago) basically get ignored. Now it just seems utterly unavoidable.

Offline Pete3206

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17959
  • Location: Erdington
  • GM : PCM
Re: MOTD
« Reply #447 on: March 13, 2023, 07:32:32 PM »
It's high time for the return of Andy Townsend's Tactics Truck.

Offline JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34346
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: MOTD
« Reply #448 on: March 13, 2023, 08:05:23 PM »
I do find it odd that lineker being BBC s top earner on £1.35 million and is joined by the likes of Shearer on 440k and either Ian Wright or Jenas on over £200k , yet MOTD has only 2 million viewers .  It just seems a lot to pay for the 48th most watched program.

Online AV82EC

  • Member
  • Posts: 12361
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 22.02.2024
Re: MOTD
« Reply #449 on: March 13, 2023, 08:27:30 PM »
On MOTD I haven't watched it at all for the last 10-15 years and quite frankly its a dated and tired format. But its utterly uncontroversial and is a great shop window into the domestic sports market for the PL. No criticism of their behaviour from the BBC or anyone involved in it so a great chance to sportswash your product to a non football audience.

On IR35, I've very fortunately found myself outside on my current contract and have also noticed how few and far between these contracts are. With the emphasis moving to employing companies being liable for contractors tax status its quite obvious they're taking a completely risk averse approach. 

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal