Somebody on the post match thread said he was going crazy when we scored but his 10 year old sat there quietly in case VAR ruled it out. What a sad image.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on December 01, 2020, 12:39:03 AMI'm going to be saying this forever now, because once I think of (more likely steal) a good point I hammer it home remorselessly so here goes:When a decision is so millimetre-close how in the name of God can the exact split-second the ball is kicked possibly be judged?It's a good point. Another one is why they decided that any other decision such as penalties have to be "clear and obvious" to keep the flow and the intensity of the game going, but offsides have to be exact to the nearest millimetre which can take a few minutes to ascertain. Why can't offsides have the clear and obvious rule as well? If they have to use their lines, then it's not clear and obvious, and the goal stands.
I'm going to be saying this forever now, because once I think of (more likely steal) a good point I hammer it home remorselessly so here goes:When a decision is so millimetre-close how in the name of God can the exact split-second the ball is kicked possibly be judged?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on December 01, 2020, 12:39:03 AMI'm going to be saying this forever now, because once I think of (more likely steal) a good point I hammer it home remorselessly so here goes:When a decision is so millimetre-close how in the name of God can the exact split-second the ball is kicked possibly be judged?I bet if the the picture was frozen another 10th of a second later his arm would be back in and ball would be still in the process of being kicked.