collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by rob_bridge
[Today at 10:59:31 PM]


Victor Lindelöf by ajmant
[Today at 10:33:01 PM]


Aston Villa (3) v Bologna 1909 (1) Pre Match by RamboandBruno
[Today at 10:32:25 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by cdbearsfan
[Today at 10:29:58 PM]


Kits 25/26 by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 09:46:45 PM]


Golf 2026 by Gareth
[Today at 09:36:57 PM]


Summer 26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Beard82
[Today at 09:30:02 PM]


Claret, blue and green by rob_bridge
[Today at 07:41:14 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games 2025-26 by rob_bridge
[Today at 10:59:31 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Dante Lavelli
[Today at 10:40:42 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Luffbralion
[Today at 10:34:12 PM]


Re: Victor Lindelöf by ajmant
[Today at 10:33:01 PM]


Re: Aston Villa (3) v Bologna 1909 (1) Pre Match by RamboandBruno
[Today at 10:32:25 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by cdbearsfan
[Today at 10:29:58 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by nigel
[Today at 10:29:31 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 10:28:27 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: VAR  (Read 507353 times)

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37052
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: VAR
« Reply #3255 on: February 21, 2024, 12:37:01 PM »
I've watched the Watkins penalty shout again, and it's unbelievable. Ollie is in full control of the ball, and he gets both a shoulder barge AND his leg being taken away. It's as clear a foul as you'll ever see, and if it was in the middle of the park it would be both a foul and a yellow card. Thank god we won anyway, but even so, it was abysmal from the ref and VAR.

Are shoulder barges a foul? Always thought they were a general allowable thing. I think if Watkins had allowed the ball to run more left, it was more likely to be given because the shoulder to shoulder would have been impossible by Diop.

Offline dave shelley

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16217
  • Age: 77
  • Location: between a rock and a hard place
  • GM : 12.02.2027
Re: VAR
« Reply #3256 on: February 21, 2024, 12:38:42 PM »
I've watched the Watkins penalty shout again, and it's unbelievable. Ollie is in full control of the ball, and he gets both a shoulder barge AND his leg being taken away. It's as clear a foul as you'll ever see, and if it was in the middle of the park it would be both a foul and a yellow card. Thank god we won anyway, but even so, it was abysmal from the ref and VAR.

A definite penalty.   Referee's first game in the PL (we all have to start somewhere) and my take on it is that Fred in the Shed was under instructions to only interfere if things were blatantly obvious and decided that that particular incident wasn't whilst it obviously was.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 39052
  • Age: 46
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: VAR
« Reply #3257 on: February 21, 2024, 01:51:13 PM »
I've watched the Watkins penalty shout again, and it's unbelievable. Ollie is in full control of the ball, and he gets both a shoulder barge AND his leg being taken away. It's as clear a foul as you'll ever see, and if it was in the middle of the park it would be both a foul and a yellow card. Thank god we won anyway, but even so, it was abysmal from the ref and VAR.

Are shoulder barges a foul? Always thought they were a general allowable thing. I think if Watkins had allowed the ball to run more left, it was more likely to be given because the shoulder to shoulder would have been impossible by Diop.

McGinn got booked for one (slightly harshly in my opinion) in the first half so clearly they can be according to that referee.

Online Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35422
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 17.10.2026
Re: VAR
« Reply #3258 on: February 21, 2024, 02:00:11 PM »
I've watched the Watkins penalty shout again, and it's unbelievable. Ollie is in full control of the ball, and he gets both a shoulder barge AND his leg being taken away. It's as clear a foul as you'll ever see, and if it was in the middle of the park it would be both a foul and a yellow card. Thank god we won anyway, but even so, it was abysmal from the ref and VAR.

A definite penalty.   Referee's first game in the PL (we all have to start somewhere) and my take on it is that Fred in the Shed was under instructions to only interfere if things were blatantly obvious and decided that that particular incident wasn't whilst it obviously was.

I think you're right Dave. The ref gets no flack because it's then a VAR issue for missing/ignoring it.

Offline Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7639
  • Age: 51
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 07.03.2027
Re: VAR
« Reply #3259 on: February 21, 2024, 02:10:43 PM »
I've watched the Watkins penalty shout again, and it's unbelievable. Ollie is in full control of the ball, and he gets both a shoulder barge AND his leg being taken away. It's as clear a foul as you'll ever see, and if it was in the middle of the park it would be both a foul and a yellow card. Thank god we won anyway, but even so, it was abysmal from the ref and VAR.

A definite penalty.   Referee's first game in the PL (we all have to start somewhere) and my take on it is that Fred in the Shed was under instructions to only interfere if things were blatantly obvious and decided that that particular incident wasn't whilst it obviously was.

I think you're right Dave. The ref gets no flack because it's then a VAR issue for missing/ignoring it.

PGMOL giving a guy making his debut Brooks as a VAR was an awful call…would have only been worse if they’d given him Coote.

Offline Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24197
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: VAR
« Reply #3260 on: February 21, 2024, 02:16:27 PM »
The Watkins non penalty is a joke. If you've seen the incident you say pen straight away. If the ref has not given it you give him a buzz in the ear and tell him to look at the monitor, more so that he's new and his first Prem Game. FFS it's the objective of VAR....to spot clear an obvious errors.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 42790
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: VAR
« Reply #3261 on: February 21, 2024, 02:28:55 PM »
Same in the Forest-West Ham game, Forest player goes down in the box, ref waves play on, VAR didn't look at it. TV replays show the West Ham player stood on the Forest player's foot causing him to fall. Clear and obvious but ignored by VAR.

Offline GordonCowansisthegreatest

  • Member
  • Posts: 1521
  • Location: IOW
Re: VAR
« Reply #3262 on: February 21, 2024, 02:38:31 PM »
"Clear and obvious" is a bs excuse to cover their arses.
Just get the correct outcome, it's easy!

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 42790
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: VAR
« Reply #3263 on: February 21, 2024, 03:46:51 PM »
"Clear and obvious" is a bs excuse to cover their arses.
Just get the correct outcome, it's easy!

The problem is they make it up as they go along. A simple rule like measuring by foot of the player rather than elbows, hands, knees, shoulders, toes. It's nonsense.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37052
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: VAR
« Reply #3264 on: February 21, 2024, 05:31:21 PM »
"Clear and obvious" is a bs excuse to cover their arses.
Just get the correct outcome, it's easy!

The problem is they make it up as they go along. A simple rule like measuring by foot of the player rather than elbows, hands, knees, shoulders, toes. It's nonsense.

Aren't the toes on the foot?

Online Baldy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1760
  • Location: Hairdressers
Re: VAR
« Reply #3265 on: February 21, 2024, 07:50:21 PM »
"Clear and obvious" is a bs excuse to cover their arses.
Just get the correct outcome, it's easy!

The problem is they make it up as they go along. A simple rule like measuring by foot of the player rather than elbows, hands, knees, shoulders, toes. It's nonsense.

Aren't the toes on the foot?

Not at St Andrews.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37052
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: VAR
« Reply #3266 on: February 23, 2024, 05:36:56 PM »
We all rip the piss that he could be the star of the live action Lego Movie without the need of make-up, but it seems we should be praising him something rotten that he helped fix VAR for all the team...... what do you mean they have won a few so he doesn't have to blame the reffing suddenly.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68381305

Online Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17113
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 13.03.2027
Re: VAR
« Reply #3267 on: February 23, 2024, 05:56:19 PM »
He’s a proper twat ain’t he?

Offline baddowvillans

  • Member
  • Posts: 878
  • Location: Chelmsford , Essex
Re: VAR
« Reply #3268 on: February 24, 2024, 10:37:21 AM »
He must be fuming though that VAR didn't award Liverpool a penalty for Odergards hand ball or is it just if it goes Arsenal way?

Offline The Edge

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7868
  • Location: Birmingham B7
  • GM : PCM
Re: VAR
« Reply #3269 on: February 24, 2024, 11:16:17 AM »
"Clear and obvious" is a bs excuse to cover their arses.
Just get the correct outcome, it's easy!

The problem is they make it up as they go along. A simple rule like measuring by foot of the player rather than elbows, hands, knees, shoulders, toes. It's nonsense.

Aren't the toes on the foot?

Not at St Andrews.
They make up for it with extra fingers.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal