I think it was a mistake to let O'hare go on loan, I'd rather he came on than Lansbury.
Quote from: TheMalandro on February 05, 2020, 09:02:03 AMI think it was a mistake to let O'hare go on loan, I'd rather he came on than Lansbury.He would have barely played. He needed to go out and play regularly for his development. The problem is that he should really have been loaned out a lot earlier. Sadly, it didn’t seem like something that Bruce/the club were very good at at the time.
Quote from: Luke8 on February 05, 2020, 12:32:07 PMQuote from: TheMalandro on February 05, 2020, 09:02:03 AMI think it was a mistake to let O'hare go on loan, I'd rather he came on than Lansbury.He would have barely played. He needed to go out and play regularly for his development. The problem is that he should really have been loaned out a lot earlier. Sadly, it didn’t seem like something that Bruce/the club were very good at at the time.Yeah he definitely wasted one season under Bruce where he made a few appearances, scored a goal or two but ultimately was never going to get an extended run in the team.
Isn't Revan supposed to be good too?
Said it many years ago. People at the Villa, including some who posted on here, were waxing lyrical about the younger players winning the reserve league (or whatever name it was going under that season) when other teams were sending their players out on loan and getting experience at the mucky end of the league. Then when said players got to the age of 21/22 they had no experience of fully grown adult football and just lost their way.