Totally agree. Cannot be 140 behind on a pitch that is only going to get worse after first knock. To get within 110 with our best batter (and bowler?) injured is definitely something to build on. No Englishman did what Pope did last game and get a big ton (or a ton at all!). That makes a huge difference in mind set, even though Crawley was only 20 away in each inning. Another positive is we are not 17-2 every game with Root strolling to the crease. Kholi back for the third test? It will only get more difficult but, win the toss and give yourself a chance.
I wonder if England will play Dan Lawrence if Root is injured? Perhaps move Stokes to four and play both Anderson and Wood. Rahul back as well for the Indians, although where he will fit in I shudder to guess. Brook is a big miss I agree, but perhaps a blessing in disguise this game as if he was batting 5 England would probably not have started all three young spinners, and, with Root unavailable in the second inning, that would have been a big ask of the two who would have played.
Quote from: simboy on February 05, 2024, 11:03:27 AMI wonder if England will play Dan Lawrence if Root is injured? Perhaps move Stokes to four and play both Anderson and Wood. Rahul back as well for the Indians, although where he will fit in I shudder to guess. Brook is a big miss I agree, but perhaps a blessing in disguise this game as if he was batting 5 England would probably not have started all three young spinners, and, with Root unavailable in the second inning, that would have been a big ask of the two who would have played. I dare say that Foakes (unluckiest cricketer in England), would be taken out of the team to accomodate Brook and Bairstow given the gloves.
Decent fist of it, but that gap on first innings was too much.
Don't care what DRS says. That Crawley wicket is bullshit