Quote from: ChicagoLion on March 21, 2021, 11:19:56 PMQuote from: PeterWithe on March 21, 2021, 11:18:11 PMYou can change a game keeping the same formation, invert the wingers, keep them higher and wider than we do, be braver pushing defenders into MF when in possession. All of which is easier than changing formation in a gameBut we don’t do any of that.Yes we do. Wingers swapped sides in Wolves, Sheffield and Leeds games, if we did tonight I didn’t notice.
Quote from: PeterWithe on March 21, 2021, 11:18:11 PMYou can change a game keeping the same formation, invert the wingers, keep them higher and wider than we do, be braver pushing defenders into MF when in possession. All of which is easier than changing formation in a gameBut we don’t do any of that.
You can change a game keeping the same formation, invert the wingers, keep them higher and wider than we do, be braver pushing defenders into MF when in possession. All of which is easier than changing formation in a game
Quote from: Ketzster on March 21, 2021, 11:34:17 PMQuote from: PeterWithe on March 21, 2021, 11:18:11 PMYou can change a game keeping the same formation, invert the wingers, keep them higher and wider than we do, be braver pushing defenders into MF when in possession. All of which is easier than changing formation in a gameYes that’s fine if you have the personnel available to do that. But if Grealish is out and the options are change formation or play Trezeguet, I think changing the formation might be the better option. If the players available aren’t up the standard required then you need to try something different But if the players aren't up to standard...?
Quote from: PeterWithe on March 21, 2021, 11:18:11 PMYou can change a game keeping the same formation, invert the wingers, keep them higher and wider than we do, be braver pushing defenders into MF when in possession. All of which is easier than changing formation in a gameYes that’s fine if you have the personnel available to do that. But if Grealish is out and the options are change formation or play Trezeguet, I think changing the formation might be the better option. If the players available aren’t up the standard required then you need to try something different
The problem is that we often look worse after the substitutions.
Quote from: PeterWithe on March 21, 2021, 11:30:13 PMQuote from: ChicagoLion on March 21, 2021, 11:19:56 PMQuote from: PeterWithe on March 21, 2021, 11:18:11 PMYou can change a game keeping the same formation, invert the wingers, keep them higher and wider than we do, be braver pushing defenders into MF when in possession. All of which is easier than changing formation in a gameBut we don’t do any of that.Yes we do. Wingers swapped sides in Wolves, Sheffield and Leeds games, if we did tonight I didn’t notice.they swapped sides at times ,so what ?
If we start playing Davis from the start we'll never win another game of football.
Davis is not the answer because he isn't a striker. He does not score, end of.
Other than Trez, who I have never quite warmed to, who else has looked consistently out of place?Most have been in and out of form. A stronger squad will allow for that
Why not do something different for a change? Surely all good leaders do this when things aren’t going well?We have been poor for 8 or so games. The three wingers have consistently been inconsistent and are out of form. Spurs are playing badly and have been turned over in the week. Their CH’s are either out of form, average or both. Therefore why not play Davis up front with Ollie and probably Bertie and go long? Our three midfielders don’t have the ability to break Spurs down by passing through them. But no we do the same thing that hasn’t worked before and are surprised by the conclusion. Poor, poor tactics and lack of flexibility. Some players are undroppable and it shows.