Just watched the Villa View post-match thing. The chap on there (Dan?) seems to think that the summer signings are the problem, which seems reasonable. I've no idea how much he knows (it'll be more than me!), but he said Smith identified targets, which were inevitably too expensive (Phillips/Maupay, I'm guessing), and so was served Suso's cut price equivalents instead. Might be nonsense but it feels kind of true.
I think the spine's OK, it's the flanks where we suck.
Quote from: SamTheMouse on June 22, 2020, 12:42:00 AMI think the spine's OK, it's the flanks where we suck.Yes. It was clear to see that Chelsea were hogging the line on both sides, and they often play very narrowly.
Quote from: adrenachrome on June 22, 2020, 12:46:11 AMQuote from: SamTheMouse on June 22, 2020, 12:42:00 AMI think the spine's OK, it's the flanks where we suck.Yes. It was clear to see that Chelsea were hogging the line on both sides, and they often play very narrowly. Yes, this has been the issue all season, not good enough either side, front to back.Funnily enough this was always the problem with Lambert. We remind me a lot of Lambert's first Villa side, just lacking the world beating centre forward plucked from obscurity to save our arses.
Quote from: LeeB on June 22, 2020, 08:38:49 AMQuote from: adrenachrome on June 22, 2020, 12:46:11 AMQuote from: SamTheMouse on June 22, 2020, 12:42:00 AMI think the spine's OK, it's the flanks where we suck.Yes. It was clear to see that Chelsea were hogging the line on both sides, and they often play very narrowly. Yes, this has been the issue all season, not good enough either side, front to back.Funnily enough this was always the problem with Lambert. We remind me a lot of Lambert's first Villa side, just lacking the world beating centre forward plucked from obscurity to save our arses.When have we last had a pair of decent full-backs?
When have we last had a pair of decent full-backs?
Watching some interviews this morning with Dean stating that we played well. The mind boggles.