More Rumors that Freund making bid.
A freund in need is a Freund indeed.
Quote from: ChicagoLion on June 06, 2018, 10:21:58 PMMore Rumors that Freund making bid. Is that a rehash of yesterday’s news or new info CL?
Quote from: Ads on June 06, 2018, 08:46:55 PMQuote from: Risso on June 06, 2018, 07:46:35 PMQuote from: Ads on June 06, 2018, 07:34:10 PMOwning 51% of a company would not allow you to pass a special measure. You'd want north of 75% for de facto ownership. S.571 CA06 in particular.51% would let you pass an ordinary resolution only, so you'd want 76% at least.Not that you want to confuse ownership and control of a company mind.You only need a special resolution for things like changing the company name and articles of association.You need it for a lot more. That's why I make the money and you count it *winky*Alright Harvey Spector! 😉Point I was making is that 51% is enough to control a company and make the decisions you need. Obviously when you get to 75%+ you can change the articles and start to do pretty much what you want, eg with share capital etc.
Quote from: Risso on June 06, 2018, 07:46:35 PMQuote from: Ads on June 06, 2018, 07:34:10 PMOwning 51% of a company would not allow you to pass a special measure. You'd want north of 75% for de facto ownership. S.571 CA06 in particular.51% would let you pass an ordinary resolution only, so you'd want 76% at least.Not that you want to confuse ownership and control of a company mind.You only need a special resolution for things like changing the company name and articles of association.You need it for a lot more. That's why I make the money and you count it *winky*
Quote from: Ads on June 06, 2018, 07:34:10 PMOwning 51% of a company would not allow you to pass a special measure. You'd want north of 75% for de facto ownership. S.571 CA06 in particular.51% would let you pass an ordinary resolution only, so you'd want 76% at least.Not that you want to confuse ownership and control of a company mind.You only need a special resolution for things like changing the company name and articles of association.
Owning 51% of a company would not allow you to pass a special measure. You'd want north of 75% for de facto ownership. S.571 CA06 in particular.51% would let you pass an ordinary resolution only, so you'd want 76% at least.Not that you want to confuse ownership and control of a company mind.
Quote from: Ads on June 06, 2018, 10:23:31 PMA freund in need is a Freund indeed.A Freund with weed is better.
We don’t know any detail really about Villa’s finances or what is reported is true, but I think we should be encouraged today that our owner has found a way to find some money to pay HMRC. Today would have been an ideal time for him to just walk away and cut his losses, money paid to HMRC benefits only the public purse and not the football club at all (this is good though it pays Nurses etc etc and not Micah Richards)He’s not likely to get a return on his investment anytime soon so perhaps this is the start of a return to a more sustainable future and demonstrates at least some commitment from him.
Wonder what the BMH renaming was all about if there wasn’t any money to pump in?
Quote from: Risso on June 06, 2018, 10:23:35 PMQuote from: Ads on June 06, 2018, 08:46:55 PMQuote from: Risso on June 06, 2018, 07:46:35 PMQuote from: Ads on June 06, 2018, 07:34:10 PMOwning 51% of a company would not allow you to pass a special measure. You'd want north of 75% for de facto ownership. S.571 CA06 in particular.51% would let you pass an ordinary resolution only, so you'd want 76% at least.Not that you want to confuse ownership and control of a company mind.You only need a special resolution for things like changing the company name and articles of association.You need it for a lot more. That's why I make the money and you count it *winky*Alright Harvey Spector! 😉Point I was making is that 51% is enough to control a company and make the decisions you need. Obviously when you get to 75%+ you can change the articles and start to do pretty much what you want, eg with share capital etc.I wish I had a Donna. I was only pulling your leg.
Quote from: PeterWithe on June 06, 2018, 10:42:32 PMWonder what the BMH renaming was all about if there wasn’t any money to pump in?The world looked a lot different before last Saturday.
I would fight you for her. With pistols if needs be.