It’s all well and good saying we need a different strategy that encourages scouting and player development.This football philosophy has to be led from the top of the playing side of the club and Steve Bruce is about as poor a choice as you could make in this regard.
Quote from: ChicagoLion on July 18, 2018, 01:25:06 PMIt’s all well and good saying we need a different strategy that encourages scouting and player development.This football philosophy has to be led from the top of the playing side of the club and Steve Bruce is about as poor a choice as you could make in this regard.Agreed. His approach for us has been mainly tried and tested old stalwarts, young loanees from clubs he's friendly with, and a scatter gun approach to lifting the seemingly better players from other clubs at our level, without much of a clue as to how to use them or whether they fit the style we're trying to play.
Quote from: cdbullyweefan on July 18, 2018, 09:42:16 AMThey never have any problem convincing their signings to join them as they're exempt from tax so have a massive unfair advantage over the rest of the league.True, but I'm not convinced tax bills are a huge factor for teenagers when deciding what club to join. The club's focus on bringing through young talent is hugely attractive. They also bought a feeder club which has now just been promoted to the Belgian top flight. The whole setup is sensible, notwithstanding the tax advantages.
They never have any problem convincing their signings to join them as they're exempt from tax so have a massive unfair advantage over the rest of the league.
Why is the money we supposedly need to find more this month than it was last time?
Quote from: Clampy on July 18, 2018, 05:17:52 PMWhy is the money we supposedly need to find more this month than it was last time? The shortfall last time might have not represented 100% of what was payable (ie we might have paid some of it). Or it might be something which is due quarterly. Lots of possible reasons.