He's poor and shouldn't be in the team.
I think he's a decent player but at the moment maybe better coming off the bench.
Quote from: Clampy on February 25, 2018, 09:46:05 AMI think he's a decent player but at the moment maybe better coming off the bench. Not as easy to decide that if we're financially penalised by Spurs for not starting him. Probably worth the risk of promotion without him featuring prominently than playing him just to save a couple of hundred thou you would have thought.
Quote from: eamonn on February 25, 2018, 12:51:52 PMQuote from: Clampy on February 25, 2018, 09:46:05 AMI think he's a decent player but at the moment maybe better coming off the bench. Not as easy to decide that if we're financially penalised by Spurs for not starting him. Probably worth the risk of promotion without him featuring prominently than playing him just to save a couple of hundred thou you would have thought.Why would we be financially penalised? We paid a loan fee for him. They can't fine us for not playing him.
Quote from: Clampy on February 25, 2018, 01:01:48 PMQuote from: eamonn on February 25, 2018, 12:51:52 PMQuote from: Clampy on February 25, 2018, 09:46:05 AMI think he's a decent player but at the moment maybe better coming off the bench. Not as easy to decide that if we're financially penalised by Spurs for not starting him. Probably worth the risk of promotion without him featuring prominently than playing him just to save a couple of hundred thou you would have thought.Why would we be financially penalised? We paid a loan fee for him. They can't fine us for not playing him.No, that sounds exceedingly unlikely. It’s more like there’s an unwritten agreement that he’ll play as much as possible and Bruce doesn’t want to upset Spurs.
I think he's a decent player, but unlike Snodgrass who seems thrive on pressure and adversity, Onomah wilts and fades if things aren't going well and loses all his confidence.