Axel Tuanzebe - gone

[Toronto Villa]

Does this means he goes back to his parent club for his rehab?

No he’s contracted to us for the season

[villa `cross the mersey]

Does this means he goes back to his parent club for his rehab?

No he’s contracted to us for the season

Thanks

[achilles]

Perhaps see him back for March 2019 then?

The situation regarding our defence is horrendous.

[SoccerHQ]

Broken metatarsal.

Will be out for more than a few weeks then.

[SoccerHQ]

Does this means he goes back to his parent club for his rehab?

No he’s contracted to us for the season

I think in fairness to VCTM when loan players get long term injuries they do usually go back to their parent club for rehab.

[kippaxvilla2]

He has gone back to Yanited for treatment apparently.

[sirlordbaltimore]

If the lad is going to be out for a couple of months then we really need to try and get his loan terminated by mutual consent just to free up another loan place in the squad for another to come in

[Risso]

If the lad is going to be out for a couple of months then we really need to try and get his loan terminated by mutual consent just to free up another loan place in the squad for another to come in

I'm not too sure about the loan rules.  Isn't it that you can have as many as you like, but can only have so many in the match day squad?  If that is the case, if he's injured then it doesn't actually matter if he's still here from a taking up space point of view.  I could be entirely wrong though.

[SoccerHQ]

If the lad is going to be out for a couple of months then we really need to try and get his loan terminated by mutual consent just to free up another loan place in the squad for another to come in

Been playing well for me so I'd rather still have him as an option come March time for the run in.

We already needed a CB even if he'd stayed fit remember.

[jwarry]

Real shame this as I think he was becoming/is our best defender. But hey ho time to build our own

[sickbeggar]

yep. could be a blessing in disguise long term. Tired of paying to be a nursery for other club's youth players and then seeing them sold on. Doesn't make financial sense and i'm not sure if it makes sense playing wise.

[paul_e]

If the lad is going to be out for a couple of months then we really need to try and get his loan terminated by mutual consent just to free up another loan place in the squad for another to come in

I'm not too sure about the loan rules.  Isn't it that you can have as many as you like, but can only have so many in the match day squad?  If that is the case, if he's injured then it doesn't actually matter if he's still here from a taking up space point of view.  I could be entirely wrong though.

Nop-e, you're spot on, no point cancelling the loan if he has a chance of coming back for the end of the season, might be useful in the playoffs if nothing else.

[Brassneck]

I'm not convinced that we could cancel the loan anyway.  A similar scenario occurred a few seasons back with Jermaine jenas when were were obliged to honour his wages after he was sidelined with a long term injury.

[Villafirst]

Put another bid in for McKenna on a permanent deal and recall Elphick. That will strengthen the defensive options. Not sure we'd get Cahill now? The main blame for the defensive frailties still rests with Steve Bruce. You could see this coming on 31st August.....

[myf]

yep. could be a blessing in disguise long term. Tired of paying to be a nursery for other club's youth players and then seeing them sold on. Doesn't make financial sense and i'm not sure if it makes sense playing wise.

This. we're currently reliant on Tammy, Taunzebe, and Bolasie all loanees. we had the same problem when we lost the play off. Id like to see us building for next year including a few of the kids rather than buying or loaning loads of new players