By playing the likes of Burton and Rotherham instead of Chelsea and Man City. Winning more games in division 2 than we did in division 1 isn't a sign we have improved or will be promoted.
We went into last season with one of the worst PL teams in history so we had to spend big to improve it. Constantly claiming we had the most expensive squad in history doesn't really tell the whole story though. The starting point was rock bottom, and you don't turn around a club after 7 years of sabotage over night, let's not forget that.
I'd say winning 15 games in division 2 is the bare minimum you'd expect from Villa. And well below what you'd expect from the most expensive side in the history of the division. We did the bare minimum and looked crap doing it. To me that isn't a significant improvement, a significant improvement would be playing well for more than the odd 30 minutes here and there.
A year ago I doubt many of us would have been satisfied with 13th, shit football, 15 wins and one of the lowest goal scorers in the division. So I don't see how a year on it's now a massive improvement.
What squad did we have in August suggested that after being the 3rd worst in Prem history and easily the most toxic, was good enough to go straight back up?Don't talk about wages, or money spent, because none of which were Bruce's until January when it was too late.
So I can't talk about signing most of the league's top scorers because it doesn't suit your point of view?