LeeS - it annoys me as well, and have had many frustrating discussions over it, it's like banging your head against brick wall isn't it.In Sunday's case had the goal been given the game would have restarted from a kick-off instead of on the edge of the six-yard box. Everything from that point on would have played out differently - not just at Wembley, but across the whole world. For instance, I might have carried on watching instead of going for a walk like I did when United went one up. On my walk I stopped and had a moan about the Villa with a Wolves fan I know, so his life has now also taken a different path to what it would have done too, etc etc.As for Vidic being sent off, Milner might not have scored the penalty if Vidic had gone as it would have been taken at a different moment in time.
Quote from: amfy on February 28, 2017, 09:43:22 AMThe same as. - 'If we'd gone through we'd have drawn x team'Forgive my geekiness but in the FA Cup, this can be true as the number that you are assigned in the draw relates to the order that the previous draw was made. For example, if Villa are drawn out of the hat in the first tie of the 3rd round , ourselves or the opponents would be ball 1 in the 4th round draw
The same as. - 'If we'd gone through we'd have drawn x team'
If Dowd had sent off Vidic like he should have done, we would have won more silverware and not be in the position we are now
Does this annoy anyone else? A colleague of mine is a Saints fan and is, understandably, upset about Sunday's result and he keeps banging on about the offside goal. In his mind the score is 3-3 and Gabbiadini has been denied a hat-trick. No matter how hard I try I cant explain to him about the butterfly effect. If the offside goal is not disallowed then the entire game from that moment on plays out differently. Maybe it leads to a different result maybe it doesn't. Maybe it leads to Gabbiadini scoring a hat-trick maybe it doesn't. But you can say with almost 100% certainty that nothing that followed that moment would happen exactly the same as it did. He disagrees and believes the same moves and the same chances and the same goals would have all followed. It brought to mind all of those times a commentator says, "Villa should have had 3 or 4 goals already", or, "Gabby could have had a hat-trick tonight". I always end up tutting at the telly. Anyone else?
Quote from: Bully2345 on February 28, 2017, 12:14:32 PMQuote from: amfy on February 28, 2017, 09:43:22 AMThe same as. - 'If we'd gone through we'd have drawn x team'Forgive my geekiness but in the FA Cup, this can be true as the number that you are assigned in the draw relates to the order that the previous draw was made. For example, if Villa are drawn out of the hat in the first tie of the 3rd round , ourselves or the opponents would be ball 1 in the 4th round drawBit the order they are drawn would be different.
If Pat McMahons goal at Leicester in April 1969 had been given we would not have been relegated to the 3rd division. Our climb back to the top would have taken two less years, resulting in us being League Champions in 1979 and European Cup Winners in 1980. We would still have won the League in '81 and Europe in '82 as well, probably a few other titles, Cups along the way with us firmly established as the dominant force when F££tball started properly in 1992. For the last 25 years we have never been outside of the top four.
I am about to go for a stiff Donald Trump in the downstairs trap. Could the ensuing chain of events in any way cause Kodjia to pass the ball to someone for a Villa goal in the second half?