I agree to a large extent, my problem is saying anyone who doesn't agree is a moron.
It's not a matter of saying anyone who doesn't agree is a moron.
It's a matter of saying anyone who doesn't agree, then goes to lengths to back their opinion like saying (a novice like) Henry has to be better for what ever contrived reason is a moron. If you think no-one is saying that then I suggest you get yourself over to Twitter. Some of the arguments in favour of taking Henry over Bruce are incredible and make no sense to me whatsoever.
"Henry will have Wenger's ear" - just like Remi Garde, presumably.
"Henry will have contacts in the game" - like Bruce, and anyone in football management has, perhaps.
"At least there won't be leaks to the media from Henry" - Really? So who leaked that Villa had contacted him?
"He's failed to get us up at two attempts" - He lost a quarter of the first season to Roberto Di Matteo, and had to contend with the loss of his parents in rapid succession during the second - that would have affected ANYBODY.
And there are far more. I might go looking for them later.
I also think its time people remembered that Bruce came in and steadied the club. We'd been relegated with our worst points total in 140+ years of existance, and followed that up by employing the frankly useless Roberto Di Matteo (don't tell me he managed Chelsea to their CL win, they'd have come close with Mr Blobby in charge that season). I think Bruce is deserving of another go at this.
