collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Emi Martinez by eamonn
[Today at 06:00:19 PM]


Fletcher Boyd by eamonn
[Today at 05:55:55 PM]


Harvey Elliott (signed on loan) by eamonn
[Today at 05:52:53 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by cdbearsfan
[Today at 05:26:51 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by SoccerHQ
[Today at 04:45:28 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 04:40:25 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Russ aka Big Nose
[Today at 04:39:40 PM]


Loanwatch 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 04:17:26 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Emi Martinez by eamonn
[Today at 06:00:19 PM]


Re: Fletcher Boyd by eamonn
[Today at 05:55:55 PM]


Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan) by eamonn
[Today at 05:52:53 PM]


Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan) by Somniloquism
[Today at 05:50:47 PM]


Re: The International Cricket Thread by cdbearsfan
[Today at 05:26:51 PM]


Re: The International Cricket Thread by PaulWinch again
[Today at 05:14:19 PM]


Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan) by DrGonzo
[Today at 05:13:08 PM]


Re: Harvey Elliott (signed on loan) by JJ-AV
[Today at 04:58:44 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Boxing thread 2017  (Read 35942 times)

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7144
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #195 on: September 16, 2017, 11:22:28 PM »
Smith fought a solid fight, be interesting to see how he gets on in the rest of the series

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55555
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #196 on: September 17, 2017, 08:42:27 AM »
Sounds like a shocker of a decision in the GGG vs Canelo fight.

Offline Proposition Joe

  • Member
  • Posts: 4496
  • Location: Munich
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #197 on: September 17, 2017, 10:19:25 AM »
I only saw it from the 7th onwards, but from what I saw a draw seemed fair. The shocker was just the one scorecard that had Canelo winning by 118-110. It was way closer than that.

GGG was relentless going forward but thought Canelo landed the better shots of the later rounds even though he was a bit ragged. GGG has a chin of granite though.

Online Villa Lew

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9133
  • Age: 75
  • GM : 16.08.2026
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #198 on: September 17, 2017, 12:38:52 PM »
Saw for the first time last night on BT a British boxer Daniel Dubois, 20, fighting another Brit A J Carter. After 10 seconds of the 1st round Dubois knocked Carter down, then 10 seconds later knocked him again and his next punch knocked him unconscious, the fight was over after 48 secs. The Doctors gave Carter treatment, including oxygen, for several minutes, but thankfully he was eventually able to get to his feet. Good to see Dubois was not celebrating his victory, but more concerned about the health of his opponent. The young man has obviously got class.

Frank Warren claims Dubois punches harder than any other British heavyweight he has seen and has more potential than any other boxer he has worked with. Clearly a named to watch out for.


Online Stu

  • Member
  • Posts: 14056
  • GM : 09.04.2021
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #199 on: September 17, 2017, 02:21:51 PM »
I only saw it from the 7th onwards, but from what I saw a draw seemed fair. The shocker was just the one scorecard that had Canelo winning by 118-110. It was way closer than that.

GGG was relentless going forward but thought Canelo landed the better shots of the later rounds even though he was a bit ragged. GGG has a chin of granite though.

Yeah, agree. 118-110 was a bizarre interpretation of the fight which, I think, is detracting from a reasonable argument that the fight was a draw. If you give the first three rounds and the last three rounds to Canelo which I don't think is that controversial, then there's your draw.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63470
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #200 on: September 23, 2017, 09:47:39 PM »
Looks like the end of Don Broadhurst's career there.

Offline PGW

  • Member
  • Posts: 6979
  • Age: 71
  • Location: Selly Oak
  • Villan, Bear and now Cancer Warrior
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #201 on: September 23, 2017, 10:20:09 PM »
Looks like the end of Don Broadhurst's career there.
What's happened to him Dave..i assume he has lost.

Didn't realise this wasn't on TV but on Youtube.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63470
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #202 on: September 23, 2017, 10:21:46 PM »
Looks like the end of Don Broadhurst's career there.
What's happened to him Dave..i assume he has lost.

Didn't realise this wasn't on TV but on Youtube.

Knocked out in the eleventh.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31186
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #203 on: September 23, 2017, 11:32:20 PM »
This Fury fight has to be one of the worst title fights I've ever seen.  Neither are any good.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31186
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #204 on: September 23, 2017, 11:41:10 PM »
If Fury gets the decision he won't stay there long.  Never seen a guy less interested in being in the ring.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31186
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #205 on: September 23, 2017, 11:42:29 PM »
And christ on a bike Tyson Fury seems to have eaten 3 or 4 of his family members.  He's proper fat.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63470
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #206 on: September 23, 2017, 11:43:29 PM »
Fuck. Now that's a turnup.

Offline JD

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10221
  • Location: Canterbury NZ
  • Stay Free
  • GM : 19.01.2026
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #207 on: September 23, 2017, 11:44:21 PM »
Hurrah, boxer wins a fight by trying to fight, while other guy loses by not fighting. A poor fight but I'm glad Parker won.

Online Gareth

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7144
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Redditch
  • GM : 25.02.2026
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #208 on: September 23, 2017, 11:54:38 PM »
What a terrible fight, glad I got on a periscope stream. 

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31186
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Boxing thread 2017
« Reply #209 on: September 24, 2017, 12:03:39 AM »
Hurrah, boxer wins a fight by trying to fight, while other guy loses by not fighting. A poor fight but I'm glad Parker won.

Me too, people seemed genuinely shocked, but having watched the fight Fury did feck all to actually win a round. Walking backwards and forwards for 36 minutes should not be considered great boxing, he did everything to not get hit, which i get, but threw bugger all back himself, and when he did it was all to counter. Glad the judges saw through it. Difference between that and the Tyson win was Klitscho did not have any of the aggression Parker showed tonight in that fight. 

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal