Apparently Giggs has said he would be prepared to manage a Championship club rather than just consider a club in the Premier League. For those opposed to Bruce, would taking a massive risk and gamble on someone like Giggs be considered a step in the right direction...or completely way off track?
And we are allowed to change the trainer and indeed horses before we need to tackle the latter fences.
he is the ultimate old boys network candidatehave you seen the media and friends who are coming out for him, Redknap, Savage, Mcliesh etcand we thought Sherwood had some chums its just a vicious circle of mates recommending mates they just keep going round getting job after job on the recommendation of other matesthe old boy network at its finestI hate the fucking lot of them
Quote from: AVH87 on October 10, 2016, 11:20:33 AMThe 10th fence on the racecourse should not be uppermost in your mind, when you are approaching the first.True but if your goal is to be in first place after the 10th fence then make sure you're not making that more difficult on yourself by only training the horse to jump 1 or 2 fences.
The 10th fence on the racecourse should not be uppermost in your mind, when you are approaching the first.
Does anyone know who else might be in the frame if it isn't Bruce? Who else is part of the "process" he referred to?
Quote from: paul_e on October 10, 2016, 12:18:19 PMQuote from: AVH87 on October 10, 2016, 11:20:33 AMThe 10th fence on the racecourse should not be uppermost in your mind, when you are approaching the first.True but if your goal is to be in first place after the 10th fence then make sure you're not making that more difficult on yourself by only training the horse to jump 1 or 2 fences.But Bruce has a good record, I don't get the issue?